Flesh out review prompt
This commit is contained in:
@@ -91,17 +91,25 @@ ${
|
||||
|
||||
4. Submit review using ${ghPullfrogMcpName}/submit_pull_request_review
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL: File paths and line numbers for inline comments**
|
||||
- Use **relative paths** from repo root (e.g., \`packages/core/src/utils.ts\`)
|
||||
- For line numbers, use the NEW file line number from the diff (shown after \`+\` in hunk headers like \`@@ -10,5 +12,8 @@\` means new file starts at line 12)
|
||||
- Only comment on lines that appear in the diff - GitHub will reject comments on unchanged lines
|
||||
**GENERAL GUIDANCE**
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL: Prioritize per-line feedback over summary text.**
|
||||
- ALL specific feedback MUST go in the 'comments' array with file paths and line numbers from the diff
|
||||
- for issues appearing in multiple places, comment on the FIRST occurrence and reference others (e.g., "also at lines X, Y" or "similar issue in otherFile.ts:42")
|
||||
- the 'body' field is ONLY for: (1) a 1-2 sentence high-level overview, (2) urgency level (e.g., "minor suggestions" vs "blocking issues"), (3) critical security callouts (e.g., API key exposure)
|
||||
- 95%+ of review content should be in per-line comments; the body should be just a couple sentences
|
||||
- the review body will include quick action links for addressing feedback, so keep it concise`,
|
||||
- *CRITICAL* — Use **relative paths** from repo root (e.g., \`packages/core/src/utils.ts\`)
|
||||
- For line numbers, use the NEW file line number from the diff (shown after \`+\` in hunk headers like \`@@ -10,5 +12,8 @@\` means new file starts at line 12)
|
||||
- Only comment on lines that appear in the diff. GitHub will reject comments on unchanged lines.
|
||||
- **CRITICAL: Prioritize per-line feedback over summary text.**
|
||||
- ALL specific feedback MUST go in the 'comments' array with file paths and line numbers from the diff
|
||||
- For issues appearing in multiple places, comment on the FIRST occurrence and reference others (e.g., "also at lines X, Y" or "similar issue in otherFile.ts:42")
|
||||
- The "body" field is ONLY for: (1) a 1-2 sentence high-level overview, (2) urgency level (e.g., "minor suggestions" vs "blocking issues"), (3) critical security callouts (e.g., API key exposure)
|
||||
- 95%+ of review content should be in per-line comments; the body should be just a couple sentences
|
||||
- The review body will include quick action links for addressing feedback, so keep it concise
|
||||
- Do not nitpick unless instructed explicity to do so by the user's additional instructions. This includes: requesting documentation/docstrings/JSDoc.
|
||||
- Do not leave any comments that are not potentially actionable.
|
||||
- The review should be thoughtful. When evaluating complex changes, consider the following conceptual approach:
|
||||
- 1) conceptualize the changes made. make sure you understand it.
|
||||
- 2) evaluate conceptual approach. leave feedback as needed.
|
||||
- 3) if the conceptual approach looks sound, evaluate the implementation. leave feedback as needed. consider everything, but especially edge cases, security, correctness, and performance. leave feedback as needed.
|
||||
- 4) only leave nitpick/housekeeping comments if instructed explicity to do so by the user's additional instructions.
|
||||
`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "Plan",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user