Add reaction to one-comment PRs

entry

@@ -121270,11 +121270,20 @@ query ($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pullNumber: Int!) {
 }
 `;
 var MAX_BODY_PREVIEW = 80;
+var MAX_THREAD_DEPTH = 10;
 function truncateBody(body) {
   const oneLine = body.replace(/\n/g, " ").trim();
   if (oneLine.length <= MAX_BODY_PREVIEW) return oneLine;
   return oneLine.slice(0, MAX_BODY_PREVIEW - 3) + "...";
 }
+function getReplyChain(comment, commentMap, depth = 0) {
+  if (depth >= MAX_THREAD_DEPTH) return [];
+  const parentId = comment.replyTo?.databaseId;
+  if (!parentId) return [];
+  const parent = commentMap.get(parentId);
+  if (!parent) return [];
+  return [...getReplyChain(parent, commentMap, depth + 1), parent];
+}
 function escapeXml(text) {
   return text.replace(/&/g, "&amp;").replace(/</g, "&lt;").replace(/>/g, "&gt;").replace(/"/g, "&quot;");
 }
@@ -121295,13 +121304,6 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
     description: "Get review comments for a pull request review, including thread context. When approved_by is provided, only returns comments that user approved with \u{1F44D}. Returns commentsPath pointing to a file with full comment details in XML format.",
     parameters: GetReviewComments,
     execute: execute(async ({ pull_number, review_id, approved_by }) => {
-      const review = await ctx.octokit.rest.pulls.getReview({
-        owner: ctx.repo.owner,
-        repo: ctx.repo.name,
-        pull_number,
-        review_id
-      });
-      const reviewer = review.data.user?.login ?? "unknown";
       const response = await ctx.octokit.graphql(REVIEW_THREADS_QUERY, {
         owner: ctx.repo.owner,
         repo: ctx.repo.name,
@@ -121312,12 +121314,19 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
         return {
           review_id,
           pull_number,
-          reviewer,
+          reviewer: "unknown",
           count: 0,
           commentsPath: null,
           message: "No review threads found"
         };
       }
+      const commentMap = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
+      for (const thread of pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes) {
+        if (!thread?.comments?.nodes) continue;
+        for (const comment of thread.comments.nodes) {
+          if (comment) commentMap.set(comment.databaseId, comment);
+        }
+      }
       const leafComments = [];
       for (const thread of pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes) {
         if (!thread?.comments?.nodes) continue;
@@ -121328,12 +121337,10 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
         for (const comment of threadComments) {
           if (comment.pullRequestReview?.databaseId !== review_id) continue;
           if (approved_by && !hasThumbsUpFrom(comment, approved_by)) continue;
-          const threadContext = threadComments.filter(
+          const replyChain = getReplyChain(comment, commentMap);
-            (c) => c.createdAt < comment.createdAt || c.createdAt === comment.createdAt && c.databaseId < comment.databaseId
-          );
           leafComments.push({
             comment,
-            thread: threadContext,
+            thread: replyChain,
             side: thread.diffSide
           });
         }
@@ -121342,12 +121349,13 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
         return {
           review_id,
           pull_number,
-          reviewer,
+          reviewer: "unknown",
           count: 0,
           commentsPath: null,
           message: approved_by ? `No comments with \u{1F44D} from ${approved_by}` : "No comments found for this review"
         };
       }
+      const reviewer = leafComments[0].comment.author?.login ?? "unknown";
       const lines = [];
       lines.push(
         `<review_comments count="${leafComments.length}" reviewer="${escapeXml(reviewer)}">`

mcp/reviewComments.ts

@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ type GraphQLResponse = {
 };
 
 const MAX_BODY_PREVIEW = 80;
+const MAX_THREAD_DEPTH = 10;
 
 function truncateBody(body: string): string {
   const oneLine = body.replace(/\n/g, " ").trim();
@@ -108,6 +109,20 @@ function truncateBody(body: string): string {
   return oneLine.slice(0, MAX_BODY_PREVIEW - 3) + "...";
 }
 
+// walk up the replyTo chain to get actual conversation (oldest first)
+function getReplyChain(
+  comment: GraphQLReviewComment,
+  commentMap: Map<number, GraphQLReviewComment>,
+  depth = 0
+): GraphQLReviewComment[] {
+  if (depth >= MAX_THREAD_DEPTH) return [];
+  const parentId = comment.replyTo?.databaseId;
+  if (!parentId) return [];
+  const parent = commentMap.get(parentId);
+  if (!parent) return [];
+  return [...getReplyChain(parent, commentMap, depth + 1), parent];
+}
+
 function escapeXml(text: string): string {
   return text
     .replace(/&/g, "&amp;")
@@ -140,15 +155,6 @@ export function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
       "Returns commentsPath pointing to a file with full comment details in XML format.",
     parameters: GetReviewComments,
     execute: execute(async ({ pull_number, review_id, approved_by }) => {
-      // fetch the review to get reviewer username
-      const review = await ctx.octokit.rest.pulls.getReview({
-        owner: ctx.repo.owner,
-        repo: ctx.repo.name,
-        pull_number,
-        review_id,
-      });
-      const reviewer = review.data.user?.login ?? "unknown";
-
       // fetch all review threads using graphql (single API call)
       const response = await ctx.octokit.graphql<GraphQLResponse>(REVIEW_THREADS_QUERY, {
         owner: ctx.repo.owner,
@@ -161,13 +167,22 @@ export function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
         return {
           review_id,
           pull_number,
-          reviewer,
+          reviewer: "unknown",
           count: 0,
           commentsPath: null,
           message: "No review threads found",
         };
       }
 
+      // build a map of all comments for O(1) lookup when walking replyTo chains
+      const commentMap = new Map<number, GraphQLReviewComment>();
+      for (const thread of pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes) {
+        if (!thread?.comments?.nodes) continue;
+        for (const comment of thread.comments.nodes) {
+          if (comment) commentMap.set(comment.databaseId, comment);
+        }
+      }
+
       // collect leaf comments (from target review) with their thread context
       type LeafComment = {
         comment: GraphQLReviewComment;
@@ -191,16 +206,12 @@ export function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
           // filter by approved_by if specified
           if (approved_by && !hasThumbsUpFrom(comment, approved_by)) continue;
 
-          // get thread context (all comments before this one in the thread)
+          // get thread context by walking up the replyTo chain (not just chronological)
-          const threadContext = threadComments.filter(
+          const replyChain = getReplyChain(comment, commentMap);
-            (c) =>
-              c.createdAt < comment.createdAt ||
-              (c.createdAt === comment.createdAt && c.databaseId < comment.databaseId)
-          );
 
           leafComments.push({
             comment,
-            thread: threadContext,
+            thread: replyChain,
             side: thread.diffSide,
           });
         }
@@ -210,7 +221,7 @@ export function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
         return {
           review_id,
           pull_number,
-          reviewer,
+          reviewer: "unknown",
           count: 0,
           commentsPath: null,
           message: approved_by
@@ -219,6 +230,9 @@ export function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
         };
       }
 
+      // derive reviewer from first comment (all comments in a review are from the same user)
+      const reviewer = leafComments[0].comment.author?.login ?? "unknown";
+
       // build XML output
       const lines: string[] = [];
       lines.push(