Switch back to one-shot reviews
This commit is contained in:
+7
-1
@@ -180,7 +180,13 @@ export function CheckoutPrTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
|
||||
|
||||
// write diff to file for grep access
|
||||
const diffContent = diffResponse.data as unknown as string;
|
||||
const diffPath = join(process.env.PULLFROG_TEMP_DIR!, `pr-${pull_number}.diff`);
|
||||
const tempDir = process.env.PULLFROG_TEMP_DIR;
|
||||
if (!tempDir) {
|
||||
throw new Error(
|
||||
"PULLFROG_TEMP_DIR not set - checkout_pr must run in pullfrog action context"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const diffPath = join(tempDir, `pr-${pull_number}.diff`);
|
||||
writeFileSync(diffPath, diffContent);
|
||||
log.debug(`wrote diff to ${diffPath} (${diffContent.length} bytes)`);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+138
-129
@@ -6,16 +6,150 @@ import { log } from "../utils/cli.ts";
|
||||
import { deleteProgressComment } from "./comment.ts";
|
||||
import { execute, tool } from "./shared.ts";
|
||||
|
||||
// one-shot review tool
|
||||
export const CreatePullRequestReview = type({
|
||||
pull_number: type.number.describe("The pull request number to review"),
|
||||
body: type.string
|
||||
.describe(
|
||||
"1-2 sentence high-level summary ONLY. Include urgency level and critical callouts (e.g., API key leak). ALL specific feedback MUST go in 'comments' array instead."
|
||||
)
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
commit_id: type.string
|
||||
.describe("Optional SHA of the commit being reviewed. Defaults to latest.")
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
comments: type({
|
||||
path: type.string.describe("The file path to comment on (relative to repo root)"),
|
||||
line: type.number.describe(
|
||||
"The line number in the file (use line numbers from the diff - usually the RIGHT side/new code)"
|
||||
),
|
||||
side: type
|
||||
.enumerated("LEFT", "RIGHT")
|
||||
.describe(
|
||||
"Side of the diff: LEFT (old code) or RIGHT (new code). Defaults to RIGHT if not provided."
|
||||
)
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
body: type.string.describe(
|
||||
"The comment text for this specific line. For issues appearing multiple times, comment on the first occurrence and reference others."
|
||||
),
|
||||
start_line: type.number
|
||||
.describe("Start line for multi-line comments (optional, for commenting on ranges)")
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.array()
|
||||
.describe(
|
||||
// FORK PR NOTE: checkout_pr returns the diff via GitHub API - use that for line numbers
|
||||
"PRIMARY location for ALL feedback. 95%+ of review content should be here. Use the diff returned from checkout_pr to find correct line numbers (RIGHT side for new code, LEFT for old)."
|
||||
)
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export function CreatePullRequestReviewTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
|
||||
return tool({
|
||||
name: "create_pull_request_review",
|
||||
description:
|
||||
"Submit a review for an existing pull request. " +
|
||||
"IMPORTANT: 95%+ of feedback should be in 'comments' array with file paths and line numbers. " +
|
||||
"Only use 'body' for a 1-2 sentence summary with urgency and critical callouts.",
|
||||
parameters: CreatePullRequestReview,
|
||||
execute: execute(async ({ pull_number, body, commit_id, comments = [] }) => {
|
||||
// set PR context
|
||||
ctx.toolState.prNumber = pull_number;
|
||||
|
||||
// get the PR to determine the head commit if commit_id not provided
|
||||
const pr = await ctx.octokit.rest.pulls.get({
|
||||
owner: ctx.owner,
|
||||
repo: ctx.name,
|
||||
pull_number,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// compose the request
|
||||
const params: RestEndpointMethodTypes["pulls"]["createReview"]["parameters"] = {
|
||||
owner: ctx.owner,
|
||||
repo: ctx.name,
|
||||
pull_number,
|
||||
event: "COMMENT",
|
||||
};
|
||||
if (body) params.body = body;
|
||||
if (commit_id) {
|
||||
params.commit_id = commit_id;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
params.commit_id = pr.data.head.sha;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (comments.length > 0) {
|
||||
type ReviewComment = (typeof params.comments & {})[number];
|
||||
// convert comments to the format expected by GitHub API
|
||||
params.comments = comments.map((comment) => {
|
||||
const reviewComment: ReviewComment = {
|
||||
...comment,
|
||||
};
|
||||
reviewComment.side = comment.side || "RIGHT";
|
||||
if (comment.start_line) {
|
||||
reviewComment.start_line = comment.start_line;
|
||||
reviewComment.start_side = comment.side || "RIGHT";
|
||||
}
|
||||
return reviewComment;
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
const result = await ctx.octokit.rest.pulls.createReview(params);
|
||||
log.debug(`createReview response: ${JSON.stringify(result.data)}`);
|
||||
if (!result.data.id) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`createReview returned invalid data: ${JSON.stringify(result.data)}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const reviewId = result.data.id;
|
||||
|
||||
// build quick links footer and update the review body
|
||||
const apiUrl = process.env.API_URL || "https://pullfrog.com";
|
||||
const fixAllUrl = `${apiUrl}/trigger/${ctx.owner}/${ctx.name}/${pull_number}?action=fix&review_id=${reviewId}`;
|
||||
const fixApprovedUrl = `${apiUrl}/trigger/${ctx.owner}/${ctx.name}/${pull_number}?action=fix-approved&review_id=${reviewId}`;
|
||||
|
||||
const footer = buildPullfrogFooter({
|
||||
workflowRun: { owner: ctx.owner, repo: ctx.name, runId: ctx.runId, jobId: ctx.jobId },
|
||||
customParts: [`[Fix all ➔](${fixAllUrl})`, `[Fix 👍s ➔](${fixApprovedUrl})`],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const updatedBody = (body || "") + footer;
|
||||
|
||||
// update the review with the footer
|
||||
await ctx.octokit.rest.pulls.updateReview({
|
||||
owner: ctx.owner,
|
||||
repo: ctx.name,
|
||||
pull_number,
|
||||
review_id: reviewId,
|
||||
body: updatedBody,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await deleteProgressComment(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
success: true,
|
||||
reviewId,
|
||||
html_url: result.data.html_url,
|
||||
state: result.data.state,
|
||||
user: result.data.user?.login,
|
||||
submitted_at: result.data.submitted_at,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// =============================================================================
|
||||
// COMMENTED OUT: Three-step review flow (start_review, add_review_comment, submit_review)
|
||||
// This approach used GraphQL to add comments to a pending review one-by-one,
|
||||
// but GitHub's API was returning null for valid lines. Keeping for reference.
|
||||
// =============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
// graphql mutation to add a comment thread to a pending review
|
||||
// note: REST API doesn't support adding comments to an existing pending review
|
||||
const ADD_PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW_THREAD = `
|
||||
mutation AddPullRequestReviewThread($pullRequestReviewId: ID!, $path: String!, $line: Int!, $body: String!, $side: DiffSide) {
|
||||
mutation AddPullRequestReviewThread($pullRequestReviewId: ID!, $path: String!, $line: Int!, $body: String!, $side: DiffSide, $subjectType: PullRequestReviewThreadSubjectType) {
|
||||
addPullRequestReviewThread(input: {
|
||||
pullRequestReviewId: $pullRequestReviewId,
|
||||
path: $path,
|
||||
line: $line,
|
||||
body: $body,
|
||||
side: $side
|
||||
side: $side,
|
||||
subjectType: $subjectType
|
||||
}) {
|
||||
thread {
|
||||
id
|
||||
@@ -180,6 +314,7 @@ export function AddReviewCommentTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
|
||||
line,
|
||||
body,
|
||||
side: side || "RIGHT",
|
||||
subjectType: "LINE",
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
log.debug(`addPullRequestReviewThread response: ${JSON.stringify(result)}`);
|
||||
@@ -293,130 +428,4 @@ export function SubmitReviewTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// legacy tool - kept for backwards compatibility
|
||||
export const Review = type({
|
||||
pull_number: type.number.describe("The pull request number to review"),
|
||||
body: type.string
|
||||
.describe(
|
||||
"1-2 sentence high-level summary ONLY. Include urgency level and critical callouts (e.g., API key leak). ALL specific feedback MUST go in 'comments' array instead."
|
||||
)
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
commit_id: type.string
|
||||
.describe("Optional SHA of the commit being reviewed. Defaults to latest.")
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
comments: type({
|
||||
path: type.string.describe("The file path to comment on (relative to repo root)"),
|
||||
line: type.number.describe(
|
||||
"The line number in the file (use line numbers from the diff - usually the RIGHT side/new code)"
|
||||
),
|
||||
side: type
|
||||
.enumerated("LEFT", "RIGHT")
|
||||
.describe(
|
||||
"Side of the diff: LEFT (old code) or RIGHT (new code). Defaults to RIGHT if not provided."
|
||||
)
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
body: type.string.describe(
|
||||
"The comment text for this specific line. For issues appearing multiple times, comment on the first occurrence and reference others."
|
||||
),
|
||||
start_line: type.number
|
||||
.describe("Start line for multi-line comments (optional, for commenting on ranges)")
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.array()
|
||||
.describe(
|
||||
// FORK PR NOTE: checkout_pr returns the diff via GitHub API - use that for line numbers
|
||||
"PRIMARY location for ALL feedback. 95%+ of review content should be here. Use the diff returned from checkout_pr to find correct line numbers (RIGHT side for new code, LEFT for old)."
|
||||
)
|
||||
.optional(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export function ReviewTool(ctx: ToolContext) {
|
||||
return tool({
|
||||
name: "submit_pull_request_review",
|
||||
description:
|
||||
"DEPRECATED: Use start_review, add_review_comment, and submit_review instead for iterative review workflow. " +
|
||||
"Submit a review for an existing pull request. " +
|
||||
"IMPORTANT: 95%+ of feedback should be in 'comments' array with file paths and line numbers. " +
|
||||
"Only use 'body' for a 1-2 sentence summary with urgency and critical callouts.",
|
||||
parameters: Review,
|
||||
execute: execute(async ({ pull_number, body, commit_id, comments = [] }) => {
|
||||
// set PR context
|
||||
ctx.toolState.prNumber = pull_number;
|
||||
|
||||
// get the PR to determine the head commit if commit_id not provided
|
||||
const pr = await ctx.octokit.rest.pulls.get({
|
||||
owner: ctx.owner,
|
||||
repo: ctx.name,
|
||||
pull_number,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// compose the request
|
||||
const params: RestEndpointMethodTypes["pulls"]["createReview"]["parameters"] = {
|
||||
owner: ctx.owner,
|
||||
repo: ctx.name,
|
||||
pull_number,
|
||||
event: "COMMENT",
|
||||
};
|
||||
if (body) params.body = body;
|
||||
if (commit_id) {
|
||||
params.commit_id = commit_id;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
params.commit_id = pr.data.head.sha;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (comments.length > 0) {
|
||||
type ReviewComment = (typeof params.comments & {})[number];
|
||||
// convert comments to the format expected by GitHub API
|
||||
params.comments = comments.map((comment) => {
|
||||
const reviewComment: ReviewComment = {
|
||||
...comment,
|
||||
};
|
||||
reviewComment.side = comment.side || "RIGHT";
|
||||
if (comment.start_line) {
|
||||
reviewComment.start_line = comment.start_line;
|
||||
reviewComment.start_side = comment.side || "RIGHT";
|
||||
}
|
||||
return reviewComment;
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
const result = await ctx.octokit.rest.pulls.createReview(params);
|
||||
log.debug(`createReview (legacy) response: ${JSON.stringify(result.data)}`);
|
||||
if (!result.data.id) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`createReview returned invalid data: ${JSON.stringify(result.data)}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const reviewId = result.data.id;
|
||||
|
||||
// build quick links footer and update the review body
|
||||
const apiUrl = process.env.API_URL || "https://pullfrog.com";
|
||||
const fixAllUrl = `${apiUrl}/trigger/${ctx.owner}/${ctx.name}/${pull_number}?action=fix&review_id=${reviewId}`;
|
||||
const fixApprovedUrl = `${apiUrl}/trigger/${ctx.owner}/${ctx.name}/${pull_number}?action=fix-approved&review_id=${reviewId}`;
|
||||
|
||||
const footer = buildPullfrogFooter({
|
||||
workflowRun: { owner: ctx.owner, repo: ctx.name, runId: ctx.runId, jobId: ctx.jobId },
|
||||
customParts: [`[Fix all ➔](${fixAllUrl})`, `[Fix 👍s ➔](${fixApprovedUrl})`],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const updatedBody = (body || "") + footer;
|
||||
|
||||
// update the review with the footer
|
||||
await ctx.octokit.rest.pulls.updateReview({
|
||||
owner: ctx.owner,
|
||||
repo: ctx.name,
|
||||
pull_number,
|
||||
review_id: reviewId,
|
||||
body: updatedBody,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await deleteProgressComment(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
success: true,
|
||||
reviewId,
|
||||
html_url: result.data.html_url,
|
||||
state: result.data.state,
|
||||
user: result.data.user?.login,
|
||||
submitted_at: result.data.submitted_at,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
+2
-5
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import { IssueInfoTool } from "./issueInfo.ts";
|
||||
import { AddLabelsTool } from "./labels.ts";
|
||||
import { PullRequestTool } from "./pr.ts";
|
||||
import { PullRequestInfoTool } from "./prInfo.ts";
|
||||
import { AddReviewCommentTool, StartReviewTool, SubmitReviewTool } from "./review.ts";
|
||||
import { CreatePullRequestReviewTool } from "./review.ts";
|
||||
import { GetReviewCommentsTool, ListPullRequestReviewsTool } from "./reviewComments.ts";
|
||||
import { SelectModeTool } from "./selectMode.ts";
|
||||
import { addTools } from "./shared.ts";
|
||||
@@ -84,10 +84,7 @@ export async function startMcpHttpServer(
|
||||
GetIssueCommentsTool(ctx),
|
||||
GetIssueEventsTool(ctx),
|
||||
PullRequestTool(ctx),
|
||||
// ReviewTool(ctx),
|
||||
StartReviewTool(ctx),
|
||||
AddReviewCommentTool(ctx),
|
||||
SubmitReviewTool(ctx),
|
||||
CreatePullRequestReviewTool(ctx),
|
||||
PullRequestInfoTool(ctx),
|
||||
CheckoutPrTool(ctx),
|
||||
GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx),
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user