post-run gate: fail review-mode runs that don't submit a review or progress (#638)
* post-run gate: fail the run when review mode finishes without a review or progress
review-mode runs that ended in a text-only assistant turn ("now I have enough
to draft the review...") were silently swallowed: the progress comment was
deleted by stranded-comment cleanup and no review appeared on the PR. user-
visible result was identical to "the agent never ran." caught in
https://github.com/pullfrog/app/actions/runs/25583698781.
new post-run gate alongside stopHook / dirtyTree / summaryStale: derived
inline from toolState (selectedMode in {Review, IncrementalReview} && !review
&& !finalSummaryWritten && hadProgressComment) — no parallel toolState flag.
when it fires, the resume prompt nudges the agent to call either
create_pull_request_review or report_progress; persistent failure after
MAX_POST_RUN_RETRIES surfaces as AgentResult.error.
also: when the post-run loop returns success=false, write the error to the
progress comment before the stranded-comment cleanup runs, and skip the
delete in that case. previously a !success run from the loop would lose the
error message into the void.
IncrementalReview's trivial-skip branch now calls report_progress with a
brief "no review warranted" note instead of exiting silently — keeps the
contract symmetric with the gate and gives the user a visible signal even
on no-op review runs.
documents the literal-record design rule on the ToolState interface so
future fields don't drift back into derived/absence-encoding state.
* review feedback: mode-aware nudge, gate-error preservation, prompt order
addresses three findings from the auto-review on this PR:
1. Review mode nudge no longer offers `report_progress` as an exit. Review
mode's contract (modes.ts step 5) forbids it; the gate previously sent
contradictory copy. IncrementalReview's nudge still offers both since
its trivial-skip path legitimately allows `report_progress`.
2. `writeJobSummary` is now wrapped in try/catch on the success-path
cleanup. without this, a throw there jumped to the outer catch and
overwrote the gate's failure message in the progress comment with the
(less actionable) writeJobSummary error — restoring exactly the
invisible-failure UX this PR fixes. step-summary writes are
informational; let them fail silently.
3. `buildPostRunPrompt` reorders gates to match the terminal hard-fail
order: `stopHook` → `unsubmittedReview` → `dirtyTree` → `summaryStale`.
when both hard-fail gates co-fire (rare in review modes), the prompt's
emphasis now matches the user-visible failure message.
new test asserts the IncrementalReview nudge offers both exits while the
Review nudge offers only `create_pull_request_review`. e2e validation
already passed against pullfrog/preview-638-review-stop-hook PR #1
(gate fired once; agent recovered on second turn).
* mode-aware terminal error copy
second auto-review caught a residual contradiction: the terminal hard-fail
error string reported "create_pull_request_review or report_progress" for
both modes, even though the new mode-aware nudge tells Review-mode agents
"Review mode does not have a no-submit exit". the error message now mirrors
the nudge — Review names only `create_pull_request_review`,
IncrementalReview lists both. additional Review-mode hard-fail test asserts
the absence of `report_progress` in the error.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
pullfrog[bot]
parent
653fae47a5
commit
85d25a6fe6
+70
-4
@@ -115,6 +115,32 @@ export function buildSummaryStalePrompt(filePath: string): string {
|
||||
].join("\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function buildUnsubmittedReviewPrompt(mode: "Review" | "IncrementalReview"): string {
|
||||
// mode-aware: Review mode's contract is "always submit one review" — its
|
||||
// mode prompt forbids `report_progress`, so the nudge here must not offer
|
||||
// it as an exit. IncrementalReview legitimately allows a report_progress
|
||||
// exit when there are no new issues since the last review (mode prompt
|
||||
// step 7), so the nudge mirrors that contract.
|
||||
if (mode === "Review") {
|
||||
return [
|
||||
`MISSING REVIEW OUTPUT — you selected Review mode but stopped without calling \`create_pull_request_review\`. the user has no visible signal that this run produced anything; the progress comment will be deleted on exit and no review will appear on the PR.`,
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"call `create_pull_request_review` now with your aggregated review (body + inline comments). if you found no actionable issues, submit with `approved: true` and a body opening with `No new issues found.` per the mode prompt — Review mode does not have a no-submit exit. the first call may error once with a diff-coverage nudge — retry the same call to proceed.",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"do NOT stop again until `create_pull_request_review` has been called successfully.",
|
||||
].join("\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return [
|
||||
`MISSING REVIEW OUTPUT — you selected IncrementalReview mode but stopped without calling \`create_pull_request_review\` or \`report_progress\`. the user has no visible signal that this run produced anything; the progress comment will be deleted on exit and no review will appear on the PR.`,
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"do exactly one of:",
|
||||
"- if you have findings: call `create_pull_request_review` now with your aggregated review (body + inline comments). the first call may error once with a diff-coverage nudge — retry the same call to proceed.",
|
||||
"- if there are genuinely no actionable findings since the last review (e.g. only formatting / comment / lockfile changes): call `report_progress` with a 1-2 sentence summary explaining that no review was warranted.",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"do NOT stop again until one of those tools has been called successfully.",
|
||||
].join("\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* check the post-run gates: did the stop hook pass, is the working tree
|
||||
* clean, and (when applicable) did the agent touch the rolling PR summary
|
||||
@@ -132,6 +158,7 @@ export async function collectPostRunIssues(params: {
|
||||
stopScript: string | null | undefined;
|
||||
summaryFilePath?: string | undefined;
|
||||
summarySeed?: string | undefined;
|
||||
getUnsubmittedReview?: (() => "Review" | "IncrementalReview" | null) | undefined;
|
||||
}): Promise<PostRunIssues> {
|
||||
const issues: PostRunIssues = {};
|
||||
if (params.stopScript) {
|
||||
@@ -144,12 +171,24 @@ export async function collectPostRunIssues(params: {
|
||||
const stale = await isSummaryUnchanged(params.summaryFilePath, params.summarySeed);
|
||||
if (stale) issues.summaryStale = { filePath: params.summaryFilePath };
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (params.getUnsubmittedReview) {
|
||||
const mode = params.getUnsubmittedReview();
|
||||
if (mode) issues.unsubmittedReview = mode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return issues;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function buildPostRunPrompt(issues: PostRunIssues): string {
|
||||
// order matches the terminal hard-fail order in `runPostRunRetryLoop` so
|
||||
// the prompt's emphasis (which gate the agent should fix first) lines up
|
||||
// with the user-visible failure message reported when retries exhaust.
|
||||
// both hard-fail gates first (`stopHook` → `unsubmittedReview`), then the
|
||||
// soft gates (`dirtyTree` → `summaryStale`).
|
||||
const parts: string[] = [];
|
||||
if (issues.stopHook) parts.push(buildStopHookPrompt(issues.stopHook));
|
||||
if (issues.unsubmittedReview) {
|
||||
parts.push(buildUnsubmittedReviewPrompt(issues.unsubmittedReview));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (issues.dirtyTree) parts.push(buildCommitPrompt(issues.dirtyTree));
|
||||
if (issues.summaryStale) parts.push(buildSummaryStalePrompt(issues.summaryStale.filePath));
|
||||
return parts.join("\n\n---\n\n");
|
||||
@@ -214,6 +253,8 @@ export async function runPostRunRetryLoop<R extends AgentResult>(params: {
|
||||
summaryFilePath?: string | undefined;
|
||||
/** exact bytes of the seeded summary file used for the unchanged-check. */
|
||||
summarySeed?: string | undefined;
|
||||
/** see {@link AgentRunContext.getUnsubmittedReview}. */
|
||||
getUnsubmittedReview?: (() => "Review" | "IncrementalReview" | null) | undefined;
|
||||
resume: (context: { prompt: string; previousResult: R }) => Promise<R>;
|
||||
canResume?: ((result: R) => boolean) | undefined;
|
||||
reflectionPrompt?: string | undefined;
|
||||
@@ -236,6 +277,7 @@ export async function runPostRunRetryLoop<R extends AgentResult>(params: {
|
||||
stopScript: params.stopScript,
|
||||
summaryFilePath: summaryStaleNudged ? undefined : params.summaryFilePath,
|
||||
summarySeed: summaryStaleNudged ? undefined : params.summarySeed,
|
||||
getUnsubmittedReview: params.getUnsubmittedReview,
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (issues.summaryStale) summaryStaleNudged = true;
|
||||
finalIssues = issues;
|
||||
@@ -321,10 +363,14 @@ export async function runPostRunRetryLoop<R extends AgentResult>(params: {
|
||||
// false-positive failures right after it just passed.
|
||||
if (gateResumeCount > 0 && result.success && hasPostRunIssues(finalIssues)) {
|
||||
// re-check the gates that can actually fail the run (stop hook /
|
||||
// dirty tree). summary-stale is intentionally NOT re-checked here:
|
||||
// we already delivered the one-shot nudge, and a still-unchanged
|
||||
// file at this point is the agent's deliberate choice.
|
||||
finalIssues = await collectPostRunIssues({ stopScript: params.stopScript });
|
||||
// dirty tree / unsubmitted review). summary-stale is intentionally
|
||||
// NOT re-checked here: we already delivered the one-shot nudge, and
|
||||
// a still-unchanged file at this point is the agent's deliberate
|
||||
// choice.
|
||||
finalIssues = await collectPostRunIssues({
|
||||
stopScript: params.stopScript,
|
||||
getUnsubmittedReview: params.getUnsubmittedReview,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (result.success && finalIssues.stopHook) {
|
||||
@@ -340,5 +386,25 @@ export async function runPostRunRetryLoop<R extends AgentResult>(params: {
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (result.success && finalIssues.unsubmittedReview) {
|
||||
const retryNote =
|
||||
gateResumeCount > 0
|
||||
? ` after ${gateResumeCount} retry ${gateResumeCount === 1 ? "attempt" : "attempts"}`
|
||||
: "";
|
||||
// mode-aware: Review's contract requires a review submission; only
|
||||
// IncrementalReview accepts `report_progress` as an exit. mirroring
|
||||
// the nudge prompt avoids contradicting the agent-facing copy.
|
||||
const expected =
|
||||
finalIssues.unsubmittedReview === "Review"
|
||||
? "create_pull_request_review"
|
||||
: "create_pull_request_review or report_progress";
|
||||
return {
|
||||
...result,
|
||||
success: false,
|
||||
error: `${finalIssues.unsubmittedReview} mode finished without calling ${expected}${retryNote}`,
|
||||
usage: aggregatedUsage,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return { ...result, usage: aggregatedUsage };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user