fix(security): block docker socket from sandboxed shell; disable opencode batch_tool

two real CI failures on main, both shipping bugs in the action:

1. `token-exfil-claude` was a real sandbox escape: GHA `ubuntu-latest`
   puts `runner` in the `docker` group, so a sandboxed shell could run
   `docker run --pid=host --privileged busybox cat /proc/<parent>/environ`
   and read the action process's env (which holds user secrets) — fully
   bypassing the unshare PID-namespace. fix: inside the sandbox's mount
   namespace (already private via `--mount-proc` which implies `--mount`),
   bind-mount /dev/null over /var/run/docker.sock (+ podman/containerd/crio
   variants) so any container-runtime socket connect from the sandbox fails.
   only affects sandboxed shells — host runner mount table is untouched, so
   user workflow steps outside pullfrog keep working.

2. `restricted-opencode` regressed in #719 (`experimental.batch_tool`).
   opencode's batch tool rejects MCP tools with `"Tool '<name>' not in
   registry. External tools (MCP, environment) cannot be batched."` when a
   model emits parallel `pullfrog_shell` (or any MCP) tool_use blocks,
   opencode internally routes them through batch, they all fail, the model
   misreads the error as "the tool doesn't exist", and gives up. caught by
   a `lens:` subagent in the restricted test concluding shell was
   unavailable and setting `DIAGNOSTIC_ID=empty`. drop `batch_tool: true`
   and the matching opencode-specific guidance in `instructions.ts` — native
   parallel tool_use (multiple tool_use blocks per assistant message) still
   works for both built-in and MCP tools without batch, so we lose only the
   1-25 wrapper, not parallelism.
This commit is contained in:
Colin McDonnell
2026-05-16 15:40:44 +00:00
committed by pullfrog[bot]
parent efc1b67e7b
commit c0988e35b0
3 changed files with 46 additions and 16 deletions
+3 -5
View File
@@ -297,11 +297,9 @@ For maximum efficiency, whenever you need to perform multiple independent operat
- listing multiple directories
- inspecting multiple MCP tools or resources
Do NOT parallelize operations that depend on prior output (e.g. create a file then read it), or ordered stateful mutations. Edits are not parallelizable — sequence those normally.${
ctx.agentId === "opencode"
? `\n\nOn OpenCode you also have a \`batch\` tool that bundles 1-25 independent calls into one wrapper call. Reach for it whenever you have >=2 independent calls. Native parallel tool_use and \`batch\` both achieve one round trip instead of N — use whichever your provider supports best.`
: `\n\nEmit multiple \`tool_use\` blocks in the same assistant message for independent calls — the runtime executes them concurrently. Do not wait for one tool result before issuing the next independent call.`
}
Do NOT parallelize operations that depend on prior output (e.g. create a file then read it), or ordered stateful mutations. Edits are not parallelizable — sequence those normally.
Emit multiple \`tool_use\` blocks in the same assistant message for independent calls — the runtime executes them concurrently. Do not wait for one tool result before issuing the next independent call.
### Command execution