learnings: edit-in-place tmpfile (drop update_learnings tool) (#635)
* learnings: edit-in-place tmpfile (drop update_learnings tool)
learnings now follow the PR-summary file pattern: server seeds
`pullfrog-learnings.md` from `Repo.learnings` at startup, agent reads
it as part of context, may edit in place during the post-run reflection
turn, server reads back at end-of-run and PATCHes if changed.
motivation: `update_learnings` required the agent to pass the FULL
merged list as a string parameter — an output-token tax that grew
linearly with the learnings size, and a constant prompt-context
expansion since the contents were also inlined into the LEARNINGS
section. for repos with mature learnings the prompt was getting
visibly noisy in CI logs.
key changes:
- new `action/utils/learnings.ts` (seed/read helpers + 10k cap)
- `main.ts`: always seed; `persistLearnings` mirrors `persistSummary`
(success path, error path, exit-signal handler, idempotent guard,
byte-trim equality skip); forwards `model` for `LearningsRevision.model`
- `LEARNINGS` prompt section now contains only the file path + a
one-line "read it" instruction (no contents inlined)
- `update_learnings` MCP tool deleted; `action/mcp/learnings.ts` removed
- reflection turn (`buildLearningsReflectionPrompt`) reframed around
file editing with explicit prune-stale + leave-alone-if-nothing-new
framing
- `learningsStep` removed from every mode checklist — surface lives only
in the LEARNINGS prompt section + the reflection turn now
* learnings: harden seed step + refresh stale docs (review feedback)
Three findings from PR review, all implemented:
1. wrap learnings seed in best-effort try/catch (action/main.ts) —
the always-on seed block ran unconditionally and an unwrapped
`seedLearningsFile` (mkdir + writeFile) failure (ENOSPC, EACCES,
hostile sandbox) would unwind into the outer main() catch and flip
an otherwise-successful run to "❌ Pullfrog failed" before the
agent even started. asymmetric with `persistLearnings`'s own
best-effort contract. wrap and log on failure; downstream
consumers (`persistLearnings`, agent harnesses, `resolveInstructions`)
already handle `learningsFilePath: undefined` cleanly.
2. refresh wiki/main.md — `resolveInstructions` parameter renamed
from `learnings` to `learningsFilePath` in this PR; the data-flow
diagram and the resolver dependency table both still showed the
pre-refactor signature.
3. drop deleted `learnings.ts` from ROADMAP.md + RESEARCH.md
"missing MCP tool tests" bullets — `action/mcp/learnings.ts` was
removed in this PR; the bullets are otherwise still accurate.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
pullfrog[bot]
parent
2e6c01670e
commit
d6de1c369a
@@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ Rules:
|
||||
- Focus on *intent*, not *what* — the diff already shows what changed
|
||||
- Get the file count and commit count from the checkout_pr metadata, not by counting manually`;
|
||||
|
||||
function learningsStep(t: (toolName: string) => string, n: number): string {
|
||||
return `${n}. **learnings** (only if high confidence): if you discovered something about repo setup, test commands, conventions, or patterns that you are confident is correct and would reliably help future runs, call \`${t("update_learnings")}\` to persist it. skip this step if you are unsure or the finding is speculative/one-off. format as a flat bullet list (\`- \` per line, one fact per bullet). merge with existing learnings from the prompt — pass the FULL merged list. deduplicate, and drop bullets that are clearly wrong or no longer relevant to the current codebase.`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function computeModes(agentId: AgentId): Mode[] {
|
||||
const t = (toolName: string) => formatMcpToolRef(agentId, toolName);
|
||||
return [
|
||||
@@ -125,8 +121,6 @@ export function computeModes(agentId: AgentId): Mode[] {
|
||||
- create a PR via \`${t("create_pull_request")}\`
|
||||
- call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with the PR link or the exact error if push/PR failed
|
||||
|
||||
${learningsStep(t, 6)}
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
For simple, well-defined tasks, skip the plan phase and go straight to build.`,
|
||||
@@ -155,9 +149,7 @@ For simple, well-defined tasks, skip the plan phase and go straight to build.`,
|
||||
- confirm a clean working tree, then push via \`${t("push_branch")}\` (same push/prepush guidance as Build mode in *SYSTEM*)
|
||||
- reply to each comment using \`${t("reply_to_review_comment")}\`
|
||||
- resolve addressed threads via \`${t("resolve_review_thread")}\`
|
||||
- call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with a brief summary (or the exact push error if push failed)
|
||||
|
||||
${learningsStep(t, 6)}`,
|
||||
- call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with a brief summary (or the exact push error if push failed)`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Review and IncrementalReview use the multi-lens orchestrator pattern
|
||||
// (canonical source: .claude/commands/anneal.md). The orchestrator does
|
||||
@@ -331,9 +323,7 @@ ${PR_SUMMARY_FORMAT}`,
|
||||
|
||||
2. Produce a structured, actionable plan with clear milestones.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with the plan.
|
||||
|
||||
${learningsStep(t, 4)}`,
|
||||
3. Call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with the plan.`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "Fix",
|
||||
@@ -356,9 +346,7 @@ ${learningsStep(t, 4)}`,
|
||||
|
||||
5. Finalize:
|
||||
- confirm a clean working tree, then push via \`${t("push_branch")}\` (same push/prepush guidance as Build mode in *SYSTEM*)
|
||||
- call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with the diagnosis and fix summary (or the exact push error if push failed)
|
||||
|
||||
${learningsStep(t, 6)}`,
|
||||
- call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with the diagnosis and fix summary (or the exact push error if push failed)`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "ResolveConflicts",
|
||||
@@ -403,9 +391,7 @@ ${learningsStep(t, 6)}`,
|
||||
3. Finalize:
|
||||
- if code changes were made, push to a pull request (new or existing) using \`${t("push_branch")}\` and \`${t("create_pull_request")}\` as needed. \`git status\` must be clean before you finish (see *SYSTEM* Git rules if push fails).
|
||||
- call \`${t("report_progress")}\` once with results — include exact tool errors if push or PR creation failed
|
||||
- if the task involved labeling, commenting, or other GitHub operations, perform those directly
|
||||
|
||||
${learningsStep(t, 4)}`,
|
||||
- if the task involved labeling, commenting, or other GitHub operations, perform those directly`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user