17b610e1a1e2695af8ca200a5759777db6d22791
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Colin McDonnell
|
9d04cad360 |
drop legacy summaryCommentNodeId column (#617)
Was retained on `workflow_runs` after PR #568 replaced the comment-based summary path with the snapshot architecture, with a "kept for backfill of pre-snapshot runs" annotation. No backfill is planned: pre-snapshot summary comments were written in the user-facing PR_SUMMARY_FORMAT (TL;DR + key changes blockquote + before/after sections), not the agent-context functional-summary format the snapshot now expects. Backfilling them would prime new runs with the wrong shape and pollute the agent context. Old comments stay on github.com as historical artifacts; the column on the DB row is dead weight. Strips the field from: - prisma schema + new migration `20260508190000_drop_summary_comment_node_id` - `app/api/workflow-run/[runId]/route.ts` STRING_FIELDS allowlist - `action/utils/patchWorkflowRunFields.ts` type union + STRING_KEYS - `utils/db/selectActiveWorkflowRuns.ts` select clause - `utils/github/enrichWorkflowRunsWithArtifactUrls.ts` node-id type, URL resolution, collectUniqueNodeIds + urlsForRun - `utils/webhooks/handleWorkflowRunWebhook.ts` two select clauses, the hasRecordedArtifact param, and the orphaned-leaping-comment alert text - `components/RunArtifactPills.tsx` ArtifactKey union + ARTIFACT_KEYS + switch cases (drops the "View summary" chip from the workflow run list) Verified: pnpm typecheck clean, pnpm lint clean (537 files), action build clean. Dev DB reset against production parent and the migration applied cleanly — column is gone from the workflow_runs table. |
||
|
Colin McDonnell
|
e4e93ea6d3 |
PR summary as agent-edited tmpfile snapshot (#568)
* PR summary as agent-edited tmpfile snapshot Replaces the comment-based PR summary path (and the in-progress update_pr_summary tool from #534) with a snapshot file the agent edits in place during Review / IncrementalReview / pr-summary Task runs. The server seeds the tmpfile with the previous snapshot (incremental) or a stable scaffold (first run), exposes the path via select_mode, and reads it back at end-of-run to persist to WorkflowRun.summarySnapshot and (when the prSummaryComment toggle is on) splice into the PR description body. Why a tmpfile rather than a tool call: incremental snapshot edits are output-token-cheap when the agent uses native file-editing tools, and range-diff cleanly across runs because section headings are stable. The agent never has to regurgitate the full snapshot to update it. Gating: snapshot generation is opt-in via either prSummaryComment="enabled" (splice into PR body) or prReReview="enabled" (snapshot feeds future incremental review runs as context). Users who disable both pay nothing end-to-end — no seeding, DB write, or body splice. Behavior changes: - Drop the Summarize mode and the Summary comment type entirely; the rolling summary is no longer a separate run shape. - pull_request_synchronize with re-review off and summary on still dispatches a silent pr-summary Task, but it edits the snapshot file instead of posting a fresh comment. - /api/repo/.../pr/.../summary-comment now returns { snapshot: string | null } from the DB instead of fetching a comment via GraphQL. URL kept stable so deployed older actions degrade gracefully. - summaryCommentNodeId is retained on WorkflowRun for legacy data and a future backfill of pre-snapshot comment-based summaries. Supersedes #534. The commit-tool/sub-agent direction in that PR is abandoned in favor of this file-based shape. * address review pass #1: synchronize fallback, splice idempotency, docs * address review pass #2: in-flight skip should not race summary fallback * address review pass #3: signal-handler flush, doc clarifications * address review pass #4: in-flight persist promise + bounded body-splice timeout * address review pass #5: defensive catch on persist worker, doc nit * add summary-stale post-run gate When generateSummary is set, we capture the bytes of the seeded snapshot file and pass them to the agent's post-run loop alongside the file path. After each agent attempt, the loop diffs the current file against the seed; if they're byte-identical the agent never touched it, and we nudge once via a resume turn (similar to the dirty-tree gate, but soft and fire-once so smaller models that legitimately decide no edit is warranted don't burn the retry budget). Mostly defends against forgetful smaller models on the Review path — their mode prompt asks them to edit the snapshot file, but the multi-step instruction can fall through when the diff is large. * trigger: retry vercel preview build * fix(action): drop unused re-export that pulled node:fs/promises into next bundle action/internal/index.ts was re-exporting DEFAULT_PR_SUMMARY_INSTRUCTIONS from action/utils/prSummary.ts, but nothing in the next.js app imports it. prSummary.ts uses node:fs/promises, and pullfrog/internal is aliased into the next bundle by next.config.ts, which made turbopack try to resolve node:fs/promises in client chunks and fail with: the chunking context (unknown) does not support external modules (request: node:fs/promises) drop the re-export — selectMode.ts (the only real consumer) already imports it directly from action/utils/prSummary.ts. * firewall PR summary snapshot from user instructions; resurrect rich format for Review The agent-internal snapshot (the markdown file the agent edits in place across runs) is exclusively durable context for future agent runs — user-supplied summarization instructions warp it and degrade that context. Drop the prSummaryCommentInstructions read path end-to-end: - handleWebhook: stop reading prSummaryCommentInstructions, stop passing prSummaryInstructions through dispatch options - action payload + ToolState + selectMode addendum: drop the instructions appendix; the snapshot prompt is fixed, not user-shaped - TriggersSettings: drop the InstructionsEditor for prSummaryCommentInstructions - prSummary.ts: reframe DEFAULT_PR_SUMMARY_INSTRUCTIONS as agent-targeted (durable context, not human-facing prose) Prisma columns (prSummaryComment, prSummaryCommentInstructions) and the matching zod schema entry stay for graceful retreat. Separately, resurrect PR_SUMMARY_FORMAT (deleted along with the Summarize mode in the original PR) and wire it into Review mode only. Initial PR reviews now include a structured summary section in the review body using the rich format (TL;DR, key changes, ## sections with before/after, file-link trails). IncrementalReview keeps its existing terser bullet-list shape since re-review bodies are deltas, not introductions. The user-facing review summary and the agent-internal snapshot are deliberately separate artifacts with separate prompts and zero shared content. * address review comments: prompt self-consistency + stale-doc cleanup PR 568 self-review (4232488109) flagged a self-contradiction the firewall commit introduced and three stale doc references that survived. - action/modes.ts: Review-mode step 2's trivial-PR shortcut said `submit "Reviewed — no issues found." per step 5`, but step 5's rewrite removed exactly that preamble. Aligned both: trivial PRs and no-actionable-issues PRs now produce a body that opens with "No new issues found." followed by the PR summary, so the user gets the headline up front and still sees what was reviewed. - docs/pr-reviews.mdx: dropped the "customize the summary style with Summary instructions in the console" sentence (the editor was removed in the firewall commit). Replaced with a note that the snapshot uses Pullfrog's built-in format and is not user-customizable. - wiki/prompt.md, wiki/modes.md: rewrote the snapshot-prompt entries to reflect the firewall — DEFAULT_PR_SUMMARY_INSTRUCTIONS is the entire prompt, prSummaryCommentInstructions is no longer wired in. * drop orphaned prSummaryCommentInstructions column Prod audit (455 repos): 5 non-null rows on a single account, all containing the literal placeholder text from the InstructionsEditor we removed in the firewall commit. No account has an intentional preference set, so silent-ignore (the keep-for-retreat option) costs us nothing meaningful while leaving an orphan column in the schema. Drop it. - prisma/schema.prisma: remove the column - prisma/migrations/20260506000000_drop_pr_summary_comment_instructions: ALTER TABLE ... DROP COLUMN - utils/schemas/triggers.ts: drop the matching zod entry * drop body splicing; snapshot is internal-only User-visible PR summarization continues to ship in Review and IncrementalReview review bodies (which already render PR_SUMMARY_FORMAT and "Reviewed changes" respectively). The snapshot tmpfile is now purely durable cross-run agent context — seed, edit-in-place, save to DB, feed the next run. Massive simplification: the body splice mechanics, the two-toggle gating matrix, the summaryHandlingCovered race tracking, and the synchronize summary-only Task fallback all go away. Code: - prSummary.ts: drop splice/strip/marker code (`splicePrSummary`, `stripExistingSummaryBlock`, `buildSummaryBlock`, `extractPrSummary`, PULLFROG_SUMMARY_START/END). keep scaffold, instructions, seed/read. - main.ts: rename persistAndPostSummary -> persistSummary; collapse to a single DB PATCH. drop pulls.get/pulls.update, drop AbortSignal timeout, drop in-flight promise machinery, drop prSummaryToBody plumbing. - ToolState: add summarySeed (replaces local var in main.ts so persist can compare). drop prSummaryToBody and summaryPersistInFlight. - persistSummary now compares against the seed and skips the DB write with a warning when unchanged — saving the seed verbatim is either a no-op or persists the placeholder scaffold, neither useful. - postRun.ts: when summary-stale is the only failing gate and the resume turn itself fails, restore the pre-resume successful result and break. symmetric with the existing reflection-failure preservation. summary-stale can no longer flip a successful run to failed. Webhook: - pull_request_opened: generateSummary follows prReReview only (the snapshot has no consumer when re-review is off). - pull_request_synchronize: collapses to "if prReReview enabled, dispatch IncrementalReview". the summaryHandlingCovered flag, the same-SHA/in-flight coordination it was protecting, and the summary-only Task fallback all delete cleanly. UI / config: - drop SummarizePRsTrigger (the toggle gated body splice; with that gone it has no behavior). drop sidebar entry, console import, Text icon import. - drop prSummaryComment from triggers zod schema, prisma schema, preview settings script. Migration: squash the two existing migrations into one timestamped 20260507000000_pr_summary_snapshot covering all three column changes (add summarySnapshot on workflow_runs, drop prSummaryCommentInstructions and prSummaryComment on repos). repo convention is one migration per PR. Action: bump 0.0.203 -> 0.0.205 (payload contract changed: prSummaryToBody removed; main is at 0.0.204). Out-of-diff cleanup: - review.ts:190 + review.test.ts:651 — "Reviewed — no issues found." -> "No new issues found." to match the canonical body in modes.ts. Verified: pnpm typecheck clean, pnpm lint clean, postRun + review tests pass, dev DB reset against production and the squashed migration applied cleanly (summarySnapshot present, prSummaryComment / prSummaryCommentInstructions both gone). * re-orient snapshot toward functional summary; drop prior-review-feedback section Empirical audit on preview-568 PR #5 showed the snapshot IS load-bearing for the orchestrator: lens-dispatch prompts on incremental runs carried forward context from the snapshot's risk register (e.g. "the JSDoc explicitly scopes to code points — do not flag grapheme-cluster issues" on the surrogate-pair fix run, "consistency with native padStart" on the padStart-added run). The orchestrator was reading the snapshot, reasoning about it, and using it to anti-prime / focus subagents — exactly the high-leverage path. My earlier "snapshot is write-only" claim was wrong. The shape, however, was steering it toward review-history-log instead of functional summary. This commit re-orients: - prSummary.ts: replace the four-section scaffold (~580 chars of placeholder italics under "What this PR does / Key changes / Risk / Reviewed in prior runs") with a minimal seed (~150 chars: just a header + a one-line comment about what the file is for). different PRs warrant different organization; forcing a refactor and a feature into the same template is procrustean. minimal seed also makes the unchanged-from-seed gate in persistSummary more sensitive. - selectMode.ts addendum: rewrite around three principles. (1) the snapshot is a FUNCTIONAL summary of what the PR does and the risks it carries, not a chronological review log — commit history can already be reconstructed from list_pull_request_reviews. (2) the orchestrator should USE the snapshot during triage and dispatch — concrete example given of carrying snapshot context into subagent lens prompts. (3) structure is the agent's call; stable headings make snapshots range-diff cleanly when they fit, but riff when they don't. - modes.ts IncrementalReview: drop the "Prior review feedback" checklist from the user-facing review body (step 6b gone, step 7 ELSE IFs cleaned up). It duplicated content that's already covered by the Reviewed-changes bullets and tracked durably in the snapshot for the next agent run; in the user-facing body it was noise. step 3 still fetches prior reviews but its role is now just filtering aggregation in step 5, not rendering. - AGENTS.md: codify "no follow-ups" rule. when an issue is identified during code review, fix it in this PR — PR scope does not constrain quality. follow-up TODOs are forbidden as a substitute for doing the work now. Empirical evidence supporting the re-orientation: - Run 25568912293 (PR#5 incr1, surrogate-pair fix): orchestrator's correctness lens dispatch said "Do NOT flag grapheme-cluster issues — the JSDoc scopes to code points." The grapheme-cluster framing was not in the diff; it was downstream of the snapshot's prior risk-section framing of truncate's contract. Snapshot influencing dispatch. - Run 25569054779 (PR#5 incr2, padStart added): orchestrator's correctness lens dispatch enumerated edge cases including "consistency with native String.prototype.padStart contract" and "fill = multi-code-point string (e.g. emoji)". Both threads carried over from the snapshot's prior truncate code-point-vs-code-unit discussion. Snapshot informing the shape of what was looked for. The cost of maintaining the snapshot (~800 tokens, ~$0.005/run) is trivially affordable when it materially improves orchestrator triage on the 1-5 lenses dispatched per review. |
||
|
Colin McDonnell
|
f662b1a0c8 |
unify per-run token + cost accounting + persist to WorkflowRun (#547)
* unify per-run token + cost accounting across agents every agent harness now logs the same 5-column (or 6 with cost) table and populates the same AgentUsage contract, regardless of agent or upstream provider. previously OpenCode and the Claude fallback path emitted a 3-col table whose "Input Tokens" was actually only the non-cached delta, silently dropping cache read/write — real runs were being reported at ~0.4% of their true input (e.g. one baseline showed Input=30 while step_finish events summed to cache_read=724,753). changes: - add logTokenTable helper in action/agents/shared.ts with stable columns: Input | Cache Read | Cache Write | Output | Total | Cost ($). cost column renders only when a value is known. - action/agents/opencode.ts: accumulate step_finish.part.tokens AND step_finish.part.cost (sourced from models.dev inside opencode — confirmed working across Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, Moonshot, and OpenRouter). drop the event.stats.total_tokens fallback since that payload has no cache breakdown. - action/agents/claude.ts: success-path now treats input_tokens as the non-cached field (matching OpenCode semantics), carries cache_read_input_tokens / cache_creation_input_tokens separately, and captures total_cost_usd from the final result event. the per-message fallback accumulator now captures cache fields too so it's no longer lossy when the result event never fires. - formatUsageSummary gains a Cost ($) column that matches the stdout table row-for-row; missing values render as "—". - scripts/token-usage.ts parses all three historical formats (new 5-col, legacy 4-col Claude success, legacy 3-col lossy) and explicitly flags the lossy runs instead of averaging misleading values. validation (pnpm play --local, identical "say hello" prompt): agent+model Input CacheR CacheW Output Total Cost OpenCode + Anthropic Sonnet 4.6 4 41,177 20,735 129 62,045 $0.0921 Claude CLI + Anthropic Sonnet 4.6 9 80,133 11,611 389 92,142 $0.0766 OpenCode + OpenAI codex-mini 10,893 46,976 0 606 58,475 $0.0059 OpenCode + Google Gemini 3 Flash — — — — — $0.0114 OpenCode + xAI Grok 4 Fast — — — — — $0.0035 OpenCode + DeepSeek Chat 18,854 0 0 1 18,855 $0.0053 OpenCode + Moonshot Kimi K2.5 — — — — — $0.0106 OpenCode + OpenRouter→Anthropic — — — — — $0.0617 OpenCode + OpenRouter→OpenAI — — — — — $0.0038 * isolate play.ts from developer gitconfig play.ts is a CI-emulator but inherits the developer's user- and system-scope gitconfig. a common local convenience — url."git@github.com:".insteadOf "https://github.com/" to force SSH auth — gets applied at read time on every git call inside the temp repo, causing `git remote get-url --push origin` to return an SSH URL instead of the stored HTTPS one. pullfrog_push_branch's validatePushDestination (correctly) treats that as tampering and blocks the push. the agent then burns the full MAX_COMMIT_RETRIES budget trying workarounds that can't beat a user-scope insteadOf rule, turning a trivial "say hello" run into a 1.35M-token session. point GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL and GIT_CONFIG_SYSTEM at /dev/null inside run() so the play process and its spawned agent see the same empty gitconfig that a real CI runner would. CI has no rewrites, so this is a no-op there; dev machines get CI-identical git state. SSH client config (~/.ssh/config and keys) is separate from gitconfig and is unaffected, so setupTestRepo's SSH clone still works locally. setupGit only writes --local scope, so nothing downstream depends on user-scope values. verification: with the scratch repo cleaned up and this isolation in place, OpenCode + Anthropic on the same "say hello" prompt goes from 1,349,654 tokens / $2.00+ to 62,045 tokens / $0.0921 — no retry loop, no push blocks. * persist aggregated token + cost usage to WorkflowRun AgentUsage has been memory-only — rendered into the GitHub step summary and then discarded when the runner tears down. that made questions like "avg cost per customer per day" require log-spelunking. persist it: - add Int? columns for inputTokens / outputTokens / cacheReadTokens / cacheWriteTokens and a Decimal? costUsd column on workflow_runs. Int4's 2.1B ceiling is ~200x larger than any realistic run so BigInt would be overkill. costUsd uses the same default Decimal precision as existing money columns (accounts.usageUsd, proxy_keys.hwmUsage). - extend PATCH /api/workflow-run/[runId] to accept the new numeric fields alongside the existing artifact strings. per-field type validation ensures the allowlist stays scalar-safe and rejects negative / non-finite values. - generalize patchWorkflowRunFields in the action so it accepts a mixed string/number payload, and add an aggregateUsage(entries) helper that sums per-agent AgentUsage records into a single patch. - call the reporter from main.ts's outer finally block, gated on toolContext. this is the shared cleanup path that every agent implementation flows through — claude.ts, opencode.ts, and any future harness all push their AgentUsage into toolState.usageEntries via the same line 468, so one finally-block call covers them all. running in finally also means partial usage gets persisted even when the agent errored out mid-run. * anneal token + cost accounting follow-up polish from a review pass: - aggregate usage across commit-retry iterations inside each agent harness. previously runClaude / runOpenCode returned only the final retry's usage, so any run that hit the dirty-tree retry loop under-counted tokens and cost in both the stdout table and the WorkflowRun row. added a shared mergeAgentUsage helper in agents/shared.ts; both harnesses now fold each iteration's usage into a running total and return the sum. - scripts/token-usage.ts now handles the unified format with or without the Cost ($) column. previously the int-only number regex rejected decimals and the 5-cell length check rejected 6-cell rows, so logs from post-cost-tracking runs fell through to "no token table". the parser now accepts both 5- and 6-cell unified rows, splits int vs decimal cells, and averages reported Cost alongside the tokens. - PATCH /api/workflow-run/[runId] now rejects INT field values above INT4_MAX (2_147_483_647) so a malformed payload gets a clean 400 instead of propagating a Prisma error. also defends against a compromised runner sending a deliberately huge value. - clarifying comments: opencode.ts documents that step_finish.part.cost is a per-step delta (empirically verified), main.ts explains that toolState.usageEntries already carries merged per-retry usage so aggregateUsage just sums entries (one per agent.run()). - tests for aggregateUsage and mergeAgentUsage — 12 new cases covering empty / partial / multi-agent inputs and the "keep undefined" semantic that prevents spurious zeros from being persisted. - drop `as number` cast in logTokenTable — narrow via const instead. * anneal: clamp INT overflow + guarantee mergeAgentUsage immutability second review pass surfaced two defensive gaps: - a single token field exceeding INT4_MAX would pass the client but be rejected by the server's per-field validator, writing a partial row with some NULLs where sums belonged. clamp in aggregateUsage so the wire payload is always self-consistent across all numeric columns, with a loud warning so the clamp doesn't silently swallow weirdness. - mergeAgentUsage's single-sided branches returned the input reference. callers treat AgentUsage as immutable but future callers might not; always return a fresh shallow copy instead. two new tests guarantee the no-mutation-leak property. no behavior change in the happy path — INT4_MAX is ~200x the largest realistic per-run token count. * anneal: resilient usage persistence + cross-platform null device third review pass surfaced three small issues: - main.ts finally block: writeGitHubUsageSummaryToFile throwing would skip the WorkflowRun usage PATCH. both are independent best-effort cleanup tasks — wrap the former in catch so a filesystem failure doesn't block DB persistence. - AgentUsage.inputTokens had no jsdoc explaining that it's the full billable input (cached + non-cached). the same word "Input" means "non-cached only" in the stdout/markdown tables (derived by subtraction). document the semantic so dashboards querying WorkflowRun.inputTokens don't misinterpret it. - play.ts gitconfig isolation was hard-coded to "/dev/null" which doesn't exist on Windows. use `os.devNull` for cross-platform parity (resolves to `\\.\nul` on win32). the project is Linux-only in CI so this only helps local Windows contributors, but it's a zero-cost swap. also updated the finally-block caveat comment: usage is only pushed to toolState.usageEntries when agent.run() returns an AgentResult, not when the timeout race rejects — so timed-out runs don't persist partial usage. documented instead of trying to thread state through Promise.race. * anneal: NaN-guard cost accumulators + clarify inputTokens docs final polish from review round 4: - guard both cost accumulators (opencode step_finish.part.cost and claude result.total_cost_usd) with Number.isFinite. `typeof x === "number"` accepts NaN, and one NaN `+=` would poison the running total for the whole session. - reword prisma schema comment on WorkflowRun usage fields to call out that cacheReadTokens / cacheWriteTokens are SUB-totals within inputTokens (not additional tokens on top). prevents future dashboards from double-counting by ~2x when summing "total tokens used". |
||
|
David Blass
|
a4c7c0fc15 |
feat: workflow run artifact chips + GraphQL url resolution (#447) (#527)
* plan: issue 447 run artifact tracking and UI (supersedes stale pill notes) Made-with: Cursor * feat: workflow run artifact urls, chips, and safe PATCH validation Made-with: Cursor * chore(action): refresh latest-by-provider model snapshot Made-with: Cursor * refactor: resolve artifact urls via GraphQL nodes(ids), drop stored url columns Made-with: Cursor * docs: finalize issue 447 run-artifacts plan; remove demo backfill script Made-with: Cursor * refactor: DRY node-id constraint, replace margin with padding wrapper Made-with: Cursor * refactor: DRY audit — shared row info, derived types, unified Prisma select - extract WorkflowRunRowInfo component (description + issue link + time + pills) shared by ActiveWorkflowRunsSection and WorkflowRunHistory - derive API payload types via Omit + & instead of manual field lists; serialize with spread + override for bigint/date fields - extract workflowRunListSelect shared Prisma select base; history extends with completedAt - inline updateCommentNodeId → direct patchWorkflowRunFields calls - derive WorkflowRunArtifactSlice from canonical exported types - delete cancelling-out URL column migrations (no schema change vs main) Made-with: Cursor * refactor: artifact chips as inline CTAs with proper vertical alignment - chips now render as action links: "Open PR #N", "View summary", etc. - only render chips with resolved URLs; remove inert span fallback - inline chips in the row (right-justified) instead of a separate line - fix vertical alignment: remove ul/li wrappers that caused line-height mismatch, render chips as direct row siblings via flat flex layout - change row to items-center, remove compensating self-start/pt nudges - cancelled run X icon uses red-600 Made-with: Cursor * chore(action): refresh latest-by-provider model snapshot Made-with: Cursor --------- Co-authored-by: Colin McDonnell <colinmcd94@gmail.com> |