improve review mode: no compliments, no unrelated nitpicks

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
Colin McDonnell
2026-02-20 19:19:09 +00:00
committed by pullfrog[bot]
parent 823fa3a39b
commit 3d0c12976e
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -144427,7 +144427,7 @@ function computeModes() {
- **Check PR consistency**: Does the PR title/description match the actual code changes? Flag significant discrepancies.
- Do NOT stop at "this looks reasonable." Dig until you either find a problem or have concrete evidence there isn't one.
4. **DRAFT LINE-BY-LINE COMMENTS** - Every comment must be actionable: the author should need to change something in response. 2-3 sentences max. Use the NEW line number from the diff (second column: \`| OLD | NEW | TYPE | CODE\`). If no issues found, skip to step 5. Non-actionable comments (praise, style preferences, minor optimizations, documentation nits) must not be drafted. If no comments survive and you have no significant concerns, **do not submit a review**. Use \`${ghPullfrogMcpName}/report_progress\` to note the PR was reviewed and no issues were found.
4. **DRAFT LINE-BY-LINE COMMENTS** - Every comment must be actionable: the author should need to change something in response. 2-3 sentences max. Use the NEW line number from the diff (second column: \`| OLD | NEW | TYPE | CODE\`). If no issues found, skip to step 5. NO COMPLIMENTS. NO NITPICKING ABOUT CHANGES UNRELATED TO THE MAIN CHANGE. Non-actionable comments (praise, style preferences, minor optimizations, documentation nits) must not be drafted. If no comments survive and you have no significant concerns, **do not submit a review**. Use \`${ghPullfrogMcpName}/report_progress\` to note the PR was reviewed and no issues were found.
5. **WRITE SUMMARY** - Draft a 1-3 sentence summary for the review body. Include urgency level and any concerns about code outside the diff.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ export function computeModes(): Mode[] {
- **Check PR consistency**: Does the PR title/description match the actual code changes? Flag significant discrepancies.
- Do NOT stop at "this looks reasonable." Dig until you either find a problem or have concrete evidence there isn't one.
4. **DRAFT LINE-BY-LINE COMMENTS** - Every comment must be actionable: the author should need to change something in response. 2-3 sentences max. Use the NEW line number from the diff (second column: \`| OLD | NEW | TYPE | CODE\`). If no issues found, skip to step 5. Non-actionable comments (praise, style preferences, minor optimizations, documentation nits) must not be drafted. If no comments survive and you have no significant concerns, **do not submit a review**. Use \`${ghPullfrogMcpName}/report_progress\` to note the PR was reviewed and no issues were found.
4. **DRAFT LINE-BY-LINE COMMENTS** - Every comment must be actionable: the author should need to change something in response. 2-3 sentences max. Use the NEW line number from the diff (second column: \`| OLD | NEW | TYPE | CODE\`). If no issues found, skip to step 5. NO COMPLIMENTS. NO NITPICKING ABOUT CHANGES UNRELATED TO THE MAIN CHANGE. Non-actionable comments (praise, style preferences, minor optimizations, documentation nits) must not be drafted. If no comments survive and you have no significant concerns, **do not submit a review**. Use \`${ghPullfrogMcpName}/report_progress\` to note the PR was reviewed and no issues were found.
5. **WRITE SUMMARY** - Draft a 1-3 sentence summary for the review body. Include urgency level and any concerns about code outside the diff.