Colin McDonnell 0055aef618 feat: add Claude Code agent for Anthropic model users (#502)
* feat: add Claude Code agent for Anthropic model users

Re-adds Claude Code support (removed in #478) so users with Anthropic API
keys or Claude Code OAuth tokens can use their Claude subscriptions directly.

When an Anthropic model is selected and Claude Code credentials are available,
the system auto-selects the Claude agent instead of OpenCode. The harness
mirrors opentoad's security model: native Bash blocked via --disallowedTools,
MCP ShellTool for restricted shell, ASKPASS for git auth. Includes NDJSON
streaming, provider error detection, cache/cost tracking, browser skill,
and todo progress tracking.

Key changes:
- action/agents/claude.ts: full Claude Code harness
- action/utils/agent.ts: auto-select Claude for anthropic/* models
- action/utils/providerErrors.ts: extracted shared provider error detection
- action/utils/skills.ts: extracted shared skill installation (agent-aware)
- action/models.ts: add CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN to anthropic envVars
- action/utils/docker.ts: add CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN to test env allowlist
- CI: add claude to test matrix, pass CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: remove unused toolId variable, fix apiKeys test env cleanup

The apiKeys test cleanup stripped *_API_KEY vars but missed
CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN which doesn't match that pattern.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: strip provider prefix from PULLFROG_MODEL in Claude agent

the env override path was returning the raw value (e.g.
"anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5") without stripping the provider prefix,
causing the Claude CLI to receive an invalid model ID.

Made-with: Cursor

* fix: remove dead cliPath field, add CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN to workflows

remove unused cliPath from Claude agent RunParams, and pass
CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN through all pullfrog.yml workflow templates
so users with Claude Pro/Team subscriptions can use their membership.

Made-with: Cursor

* fix: block Bash subagent in Claude Code disallowedTools

Made-with: Cursor

* chore: update model snapshot (opencode/openrouter latest → qwen3.6-plus-free)

Made-with: Cursor

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-31 03:29:54 +00:00
2026-01-16 08:00:16 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00
2025-08-27 16:53:48 -07:00
2026-01-19 08:41:56 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00
2026-03-27 16:09:13 +00:00
2026-02-06 07:16:14 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00

Green Pullfrog logo
Pullfrog

Bring your favorite coding agent into GitHub


🚀 Pullfrog is in beta! We're onboarding users in waves. Get on the waitlist →


What is Pullfrog?

Pullfrog is a GitHub bot that brings the full power of your favorite coding agents into GitHub. It's open source and powered by GitHub Actions.

  • Tag @pullfrog — Tag @pullfrog in a comment anywhere in your repo. It will pull in any relevant context using the action's internal MCP server and perform the appropriate task.
  • Prompt from the web — Trigger arbitrary tasks from the Pullfrog dashboard
  • Automated triggers — Configure Pullfrog to trigger agent runs in response to specific events. Each of these triggers can be associated with custom prompt instructions.
    • issue created
    • issue labeled
    • PR created
    • PR review created
    • PR review requested
    • and more...

Pullfrog is the bridge between your preferred coding agents and GitHub. Use it for:

  • 🤖 Coding tasks — Tell @pullfrog to implement something and it'll spin up a PR. If CI fails, it'll read the logs and attempt a fix automatically. It'll automatically address any PR reviews too.
  • 🔍 PR review — Coding agents are great at reviewing PRs. Using the "PR created" trigger, you can configure Pullfrog to auto-review new PRs.
  • 🤙 Issue management — Via the "issue created" trigger, Pullfrog can automatically respond to common questions, create implementation plans, and link to related issues/PRs. Or (if you're feeling lucky) you can prompt it to immediately attempt a PR addressing new issues.
  • Literally whatever — Want to have the agent automatically add docs to all new PRs? Cut a new release with agent-written notes on every commit to main? Pullfrog lets you do it.

Standalone Usage

You can also use pullfrog/pullfrog as a step in your own workflows. The action exposes a result output that can be consumed by subsequent steps.

Example: Auto-generate release notes on new tags

name: Release
on:
  push:
    tags: ['v*']

permissions:
  contents: write

jobs:
  release:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Generate release notes
        id: notes
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Generate release notes for ${{ github.ref_name }}.
            Compare commits between this tag and the previous tag.
            Format as markdown: summary paragraph, then ### Features, ### Fixes, ### Breaking Changes sections.
            Omit empty sections. Be concise.
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      # write to file to avoid shell escaping issues with special characters
      - name: Create GitHub release
        run: |
          notesfile="$RUNNER_TEMP/release-notes-$GITHUB_RUN_ID.md"
          printf '%s' "$NOTES" > "$notesfile"
          gh release create ${{ github.ref_name }} --title "${{ github.ref_name }}" --notes-file "$notesfile"
        env:
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
          NOTES: ${{ steps.notes.outputs.result }}

Example: Structured Output with Zod Schema

You can force the agent to return structured JSON output by providing a JSON schema. This allows you to reliably parse and use the agent's response in subsequent workflow steps.

You can define your JSON schema directly or uou can use any validation library that converts to JSON Schema. Here's an example using Zod:

name: Release Check
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [closed]

jobs:
  check-release:
    if: github.event.pull_request.merged == true
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: npm install --no-save --no-package-lock zod @actions/core

      - name: Generate Schema
        id: schema
        run: |
          node -e '
            import { z } from "zod";
            import { setOutput } from "@actions/core";
            const schema = z.object({
              version: z.string().describe("Semantic version number (e.g. 1.0.0)"),
              isBreaking: z.boolean().describe("Whether this release contains breaking changes"),
              changelog: z.array(z.string()).describe("List of changes in this release"),
            });
            setOutput("schema", JSON.stringify(z.toJSONSchema(schema)));
          '

      - name: Analyze PR
        id: analysis
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Analyze this PR and determine semantic versioning impact.
            Return a JSON object matching the provided schema.
          output_schema: ${{ steps.schema.outputs.schema }}
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      - name: Process Result
        run: |
          # Parse the JSON result using fromJSON()
          echo "Version: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).version }}"
          echo "Breaking: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).isBreaking }}"
S
Description
Self-hosted Ollama-powered code review bot for Gitea Actions based on pullfrog
Readme MIT 27 MiB
Languages
TypeScript 97.9%
Shell 0.7%
Dockerfile 0.7%
JavaScript 0.7%