Colin McDonnell 0a64659ee7 refactor: slim action/main.ts to an orchestrator + extract helpers (#755)
* refactor: extract helpers out of action/main.ts so non-orchestration churn stops touching the file

main.ts had grown to ~1240 lines holding ~500 lines of helpers that have
nothing to do with the resolver pipeline — billing-error UI/copy, proxy
minting, summary/learnings persistence, log formatters, end-of-run
cleanup waterfalls. any PR adding a new billing code branch or a new
log line was forced to edit main.ts, and since main.ts is in
ALWAYS_RUN_ALL the entire 52-job LLM CI matrix fired on what should
have been a 0-job change (e.g. #748).

extractions:
- action/utils/billingErrors.ts — BillingError, TransientError, the
  format*Summary renderers, billingConsoleUrl
- action/utils/proxy.ts — mintProxyKey, buildProxyTokenHeaders,
  resolveProxyModel, plus runProxyResolution wrapper that renders +
  rethrows BillingError/TransientError before the outer catch
- action/utils/prSummary.ts — fetchPreviousSnapshot, persistSummary
  co-located with the existing seed/read file helpers
- action/utils/learnings.ts — persistLearnings co-located with the
  existing seed/read file helpers
- action/utils/runStartupLog.ts — resolveOutputSchema + logRunStartup
  (the model/agent/push/shell/timeout block)
- action/utils/runErrorRenderer.ts — renderRunError classifies
  (BillingError reclassify / hang detect / API-key auth) and emits
  {summary, comment} markdown bodies
- action/utils/runLifecycle.ts — persistRunArtifacts, finalizeSuccessRun,
  writeRunErrorOutputs — the three end-of-run cleanup phases shared
  between the success path and the error catch path

main.ts is now ~570 lines — the irreducible orchestrator: disposables
(`await using` for tokenRef / gitAuthServer / mcpHttpServer), the
toolContext construction, the agent-timeout race, the catch/finally
shape, and the named phase calls. behavior is preserved verbatim
(verified: pnpm -r typecheck + pnpm test 695/695 pass, action/test
596/596 pass).

wiki/main.md gets a new "file layout" section describing the split.
AGENTS.md gets a single line pointing future edits at the helpers
instead of main.ts.

* anneal: address review findings

- restore MainResult.result?: string (accidental removal in initial commit;
  field was unused in current code but is part of the exported interface
  surface — keep the diff truly behavior-preserving)
- move resolveOutputSchema from runStartupLog.ts to payload.ts (it's an
  action-input resolver alongside resolvePromptInput / resolvePayload, not
  a log helper — was placed in runStartupLog.ts for matrix-churn pragmatism
  but the domain fit is in payload.ts)
- un-export resolveProxyModel (only used internally by runProxyResolution
  in proxy.ts; no external importer)
- fix runErrorRenderer.ts JSDoc "Three classifications" → four (Billing,
  hang, API-key, default)
- expand runLifecycle.ts module banner to note that finalizeSuccessRun
  calls persistRunArtifacts first, and to explain why the catch path
  splits writeRunErrorOutputs + persistRunArtifacts
- update billingErrors.ts header to point at proxy.ts and
  runErrorRenderer.ts as the actual origin sites (was stale "main.ts")
- expand proxy.ts header to spell out the runProxyResolution entrypoint
  contract (was stale "main.ts can render")
- update wiki/main.md resolver chain + dependency table to name
  runProxyResolution as the actual call site and document the early
  BillingError/TransientError rendering branch
- update wiki/main.md file-layout table to lead with runProxyResolution
  and describe mintProxyKey/buildProxyTokenHeaders/resolveProxyModel
  as internal helpers (was implying they were public surface)
2026-05-16 05:09:52 +00:00
2026-01-16 08:00:16 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00
2025-08-27 16:53:48 -07:00
2026-01-19 08:41:56 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00

Green Pullfrog logo
Pullfrog

Bring your favorite coding agent into GitHub


🚀 Pullfrog is in beta! We're onboarding users in waves. Get on the waitlist →


What is Pullfrog?

Pullfrog is a GitHub bot that brings the full power of your favorite coding agents into GitHub. It's open source and powered by GitHub Actions.

  • Tag @pullfrog — Tag @pullfrog in a comment anywhere in your repo. It will pull in any relevant context using the action's internal MCP server and perform the appropriate task.
  • Prompt from the web — Trigger arbitrary tasks from the Pullfrog dashboard
  • Automated triggers — Configure Pullfrog to trigger agent runs in response to specific events. Each of these triggers can be associated with custom prompt instructions.
    • issue created
    • issue labeled
    • PR created
    • PR review created
    • PR review requested
    • and more...

Pullfrog is the bridge between your preferred coding agents and GitHub. Use it for:

  • 🤖 Coding tasks — Tell @pullfrog to implement something and it'll spin up a PR. If CI fails, it'll read the logs and attempt a fix automatically. It'll automatically address any PR reviews too.
  • 🔍 PR review — Coding agents are great at reviewing PRs. Using the "PR created" trigger, you can configure Pullfrog to auto-review new PRs.
  • 🤙 Issue management — Via the "issue created" trigger, Pullfrog can automatically respond to common questions, create implementation plans, and link to related issues/PRs. Or (if you're feeling lucky) you can prompt it to immediately attempt a PR addressing new issues.
  • Literally whatever — Want to have the agent automatically add docs to all new PRs? Cut a new release with agent-written notes on every commit to main? Pullfrog lets you do it.

Standalone Usage

You can also use pullfrog/pullfrog as a step in your own workflows. The action exposes a result output that can be consumed by subsequent steps.

Example: Auto-generate release notes on new tags

name: Release
on:
  push:
    tags: ['v*']

permissions:
  contents: write

jobs:
  release:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Generate release notes
        id: notes
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Generate release notes for ${{ github.ref_name }}.
            Compare commits between this tag and the previous tag.
            Format as markdown: summary paragraph, then ### Features, ### Fixes, ### Breaking Changes sections.
            Omit empty sections. Be concise.
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      # write to file to avoid shell escaping issues with special characters
      - name: Create GitHub release
        run: |
          notesfile="$RUNNER_TEMP/release-notes-$GITHUB_RUN_ID.md"
          printf '%s' "$NOTES" > "$notesfile"
          gh release create ${{ github.ref_name }} --title "${{ github.ref_name }}" --notes-file "$notesfile"
        env:
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
          NOTES: ${{ steps.notes.outputs.result }}

Example: Structured Output with Zod Schema

You can force the agent to return structured JSON output by providing a JSON schema. This allows you to reliably parse and use the agent's response in subsequent workflow steps.

You can define your JSON schema directly or uou can use any validation library that converts to JSON Schema. Here's an example using Zod:

name: Release Check
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [closed]

jobs:
  check-release:
    if: github.event.pull_request.merged == true
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: npm install --no-save --no-package-lock zod @actions/core

      - name: Generate Schema
        id: schema
        run: |
          node -e '
            import { z } from "zod";
            import { setOutput } from "@actions/core";
            const schema = z.object({
              version: z.string().describe("Semantic version number (e.g. 1.0.0)"),
              isBreaking: z.boolean().describe("Whether this release contains breaking changes"),
              changelog: z.array(z.string()).describe("List of changes in this release"),
            });
            setOutput("schema", JSON.stringify(z.toJSONSchema(schema)));
          '

      - name: Analyze PR
        id: analysis
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Analyze this PR and determine semantic versioning impact.
            Return a JSON object matching the provided schema.
          output_schema: ${{ steps.schema.outputs.schema }}
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      - name: Process Result
        run: |
          # Parse the JSON result using fromJSON()
          echo "Version: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).version }}"
          echo "Breaking: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).isBreaking }}"
S
Description
Self-hosted Ollama-powered code review bot for Gitea Actions based on pullfrog
Readme MIT 27 MiB
Languages
TypeScript 97.9%
Shell 0.7%
Dockerfile 0.7%
JavaScript 0.7%