#1 generational bump on both. xAI shipped grok-4.3 on 2026-05-01 and
grok-4-1-fast on 2025-11-19; both are same brand tier as the existing
slugs (`grok` and `grok-fast`), so resolve + openRouterResolve update
in place with no DB migration needed. Mirrored on the openrouter
provider side (openrouter/grok now also points at x-ai/grok-4.3).
OpenRouter spells the fast variant `x-ai/grok-4.1-fast` (dot) where
models.dev uses `grok-4-1-fast` (dash) — verified both forms against
their respective live APIs before committing. See the "naming traps"
section in wiki/models-catalog.md.
Snapshot regenerated: openrouter latest-GA shifted from
poolside/laguna-xs.2:free (2026-04-28) to x-ai/grok-4.3 (2026-05-01)
as a mechanical consequence of the bump.
Verified via `pnpm -C action test:catalog` (139/139 pass against live
models.dev + OpenRouter API) and `pnpm -C action test` (458/458).
Considered and explicitly rejected during this audit (recording for
future archaeology):
- Re-adding opencode/nemotron-3-super-free: removed twice in
71dff24c and 0f8117af with no commit-message rationale, but the
removals are intentional per maintainer.
- Adding gpt-nano (openai + opencode + openrouter) at gpt-5.4-nano:
the snapshot has been silently tracking opencode/gpt-5.4-nano since
7dd80143 (2026-03-18) without a corresponding catalog addition — a
deliberate non-add. Also would have collided with the existing
opencode/gpt-5-nano displayName "GPT Nano".
- Adding opencode/hy3-preview-free: never been in the catalog on main
and no positive signal beyond models.dev availability.
- Bumping opencode/gpt-5-nano (free) to opencode/gpt-5.4-nano: would
silently turn a free alias paid ($0.20/$1.25 per M tokens) — not a
generational bump, would require retire-and-replace if pursued.
Pullfrog is a GitHub bot that brings the full power of your favorite coding agents into GitHub. It's open source and powered by GitHub Actions.
Tag @pullfrog — Tag @pullfrog in a comment anywhere in your repo. It will pull in any relevant context using the action's internal MCP server and perform the appropriate task.
Prompt from the web — Trigger arbitrary tasks from the Pullfrog dashboard
Automated triggers — Configure Pullfrog to trigger agent runs in response to specific events. Each of these triggers can be associated with custom prompt instructions.
issue created
issue labeled
PR created
PR review created
PR review requested
and more...
Pullfrog is the bridge between your preferred coding agents and GitHub. Use it for:
🤖 Coding tasks — Tell @pullfrog to implement something and it'll spin up a PR. If CI fails, it'll read the logs and attempt a fix automatically. It'll automatically address any PR reviews too.
🔍 PR review — Coding agents are great at reviewing PRs. Using the "PR created" trigger, you can configure Pullfrog to auto-review new PRs.
🤙 Issue management — Via the "issue created" trigger, Pullfrog can automatically respond to common questions, create implementation plans, and link to related issues/PRs. Or (if you're feeling lucky) you can prompt it to immediately attempt a PR addressing new issues.
Literally whatever — Want to have the agent automatically add docs to all new PRs? Cut a new release with agent-written notes on every commit to main? Pullfrog lets you do it.
Standalone Usage
You can also use pullfrog/pullfrog as a step in your own workflows. The action exposes a result output that can be consumed by subsequent steps.
Example: Auto-generate release notes on new tags
name:Releaseon:push:tags:['v*']permissions:contents:writejobs:release:runs-on:ubuntu-lateststeps:- name:Checkoutuses:actions/checkout@v4with:fetch-depth:0- name:Generate release notesid:notesuses:pullfrog/pullfrog@v0with:prompt:| Generate release notes for ${{ github.ref_name }}.
Compare commits between this tag and the previous tag.
Format as markdown: summary paragraph, then ### Features, ### Fixes, ### Breaking Changes sections.
Omit empty sections. Be concise.env:ANTHROPIC_API_KEY:${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}# write to file to avoid shell escaping issues with special characters- name:Create GitHub releaserun:| notesfile="$RUNNER_TEMP/release-notes-$GITHUB_RUN_ID.md"
printf '%s' "$NOTES" > "$notesfile"
gh release create ${{ github.ref_name }} --title "${{ github.ref_name }}" --notes-file "$notesfile"env:GH_TOKEN:${{ github.token }}NOTES:${{ steps.notes.outputs.result }}
Example: Structured Output with Zod Schema
You can force the agent to return structured JSON output by providing a JSON schema. This allows you to reliably parse and use the agent's response in subsequent workflow steps.
You can define your JSON schema directly or uou can use any validation library that converts to JSON Schema. Here's an example using Zod:
name:Release Checkon:pull_request:types:[closed]jobs:check-release:if:github.event.pull_request.merged == trueruns-on:ubuntu-lateststeps:- uses:actions/checkout@v4- name:Install dependenciesrun:npm install --no-save --no-package-lock zod @actions/core- name:Generate Schemaid:schemarun:| node -e '
import { z } from "zod";
import { setOutput } from "@actions/core";
const schema = z.object({
version: z.string().describe("Semantic version number (e.g. 1.0.0)"),
isBreaking: z.boolean().describe("Whether this release contains breaking changes"),
changelog: z.array(z.string()).describe("List of changes in this release"),
});
setOutput("schema", JSON.stringify(z.toJSONSchema(schema)));
'- name:Analyze PRid:analysisuses:pullfrog/pullfrog@v0with:prompt:| Analyze this PR and determine semantic versioning impact.
Return a JSON object matching the provided schema.output_schema:${{ steps.schema.outputs.schema }}env:ANTHROPIC_API_KEY:${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}- name:Process Resultrun:| # Parse the JSON result using fromJSON()
echo "Version: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).version }}"
echo "Breaking: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).isBreaking }}"