* fix(action): tighten provider error detection and propagate agent error events
Both bugs from #562:
1. detectProviderError used substring matches against "429", "rate limit",
etc. — false-positives on commit SHAs containing 429 and on x-ratelimit-*
response headers in dumped 401 error JSON. rewrote with anchored regexes:
numeric status codes only match adjacent to a recognised status key, and
`\brate[_ ]limit(?=[_ ]|\b)` rejects ratelimit-* headers (no separator).
word-boundary anchors on INTERNAL / UNAVAILABLE / quota / limit:0 reject
INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR / time_limit:0 substrings. added 11-case regression
test.
2. opencode 401s slipped through `eventCount === 0 && lastProviderError`
because opencode's own type=error event increments eventCount before
the guard runs. added an explicit `error:` handler that captures the
event and propagates it to a non-success AgentResult. opencode emits
the message under `error.data.message`, not the top level. mirror fix
in claude.ts: error_max_turns / error_during_execution / any error*
subtype on the result event now flips success: false.
* fix(action): match quota inside identifiers like insufficient_quota
\bquota\b missed insufficient_quota / quota_exceeded / quotaExceeded
because _ is a word character and camelCase has no boundary. quota is
specific enough to be matched as a plain substring.
* fix(action): match `rate limited` and `rate limits exceeded`
Drop the trailing `(?=[_ ]|\b)` lookahead from the rate-limit regex. The
lookahead failed when `limit` was followed by another word character
(`limited`, `limits`), so `rate limited` and `rate limits exceeded` were
slipping past detection. The leading `\b` plus `[_ ]` separator already
rejects `x-ratelimit-*` / `anthropic-ratelimit-*` headers without it.
---------
Co-authored-by: pullfrog[bot] <226033991+pullfrog[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: David Blass <david@arktype.io>
Pullfrog is a GitHub bot that brings the full power of your favorite coding agents into GitHub. It's open source and powered by GitHub Actions.
Tag @pullfrog — Tag @pullfrog in a comment anywhere in your repo. It will pull in any relevant context using the action's internal MCP server and perform the appropriate task.
Prompt from the web — Trigger arbitrary tasks from the Pullfrog dashboard
Automated triggers — Configure Pullfrog to trigger agent runs in response to specific events. Each of these triggers can be associated with custom prompt instructions.
issue created
issue labeled
PR created
PR review created
PR review requested
and more...
Pullfrog is the bridge between your preferred coding agents and GitHub. Use it for:
🤖 Coding tasks — Tell @pullfrog to implement something and it'll spin up a PR. If CI fails, it'll read the logs and attempt a fix automatically. It'll automatically address any PR reviews too.
🔍 PR review — Coding agents are great at reviewing PRs. Using the "PR created" trigger, you can configure Pullfrog to auto-review new PRs.
🤙 Issue management — Via the "issue created" trigger, Pullfrog can automatically respond to common questions, create implementation plans, and link to related issues/PRs. Or (if you're feeling lucky) you can prompt it to immediately attempt a PR addressing new issues.
Literally whatever — Want to have the agent automatically add docs to all new PRs? Cut a new release with agent-written notes on every commit to main? Pullfrog lets you do it.
Standalone Usage
You can also use pullfrog/pullfrog as a step in your own workflows. The action exposes a result output that can be consumed by subsequent steps.
Example: Auto-generate release notes on new tags
name:Releaseon:push:tags:['v*']permissions:contents:writejobs:release:runs-on:ubuntu-lateststeps:- name:Checkoutuses:actions/checkout@v4with:fetch-depth:0- name:Generate release notesid:notesuses:pullfrog/pullfrog@v0with:prompt:| Generate release notes for ${{ github.ref_name }}.
Compare commits between this tag and the previous tag.
Format as markdown: summary paragraph, then ### Features, ### Fixes, ### Breaking Changes sections.
Omit empty sections. Be concise.env:ANTHROPIC_API_KEY:${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}# write to file to avoid shell escaping issues with special characters- name:Create GitHub releaserun:| notesfile="$RUNNER_TEMP/release-notes-$GITHUB_RUN_ID.md"
printf '%s' "$NOTES" > "$notesfile"
gh release create ${{ github.ref_name }} --title "${{ github.ref_name }}" --notes-file "$notesfile"env:GH_TOKEN:${{ github.token }}NOTES:${{ steps.notes.outputs.result }}
Example: Structured Output with Zod Schema
You can force the agent to return structured JSON output by providing a JSON schema. This allows you to reliably parse and use the agent's response in subsequent workflow steps.
You can define your JSON schema directly or uou can use any validation library that converts to JSON Schema. Here's an example using Zod:
name:Release Checkon:pull_request:types:[closed]jobs:check-release:if:github.event.pull_request.merged == trueruns-on:ubuntu-lateststeps:- uses:actions/checkout@v4- name:Install dependenciesrun:npm install --no-save --no-package-lock zod @actions/core- name:Generate Schemaid:schemarun:| node -e '
import { z } from "zod";
import { setOutput } from "@actions/core";
const schema = z.object({
version: z.string().describe("Semantic version number (e.g. 1.0.0)"),
isBreaking: z.boolean().describe("Whether this release contains breaking changes"),
changelog: z.array(z.string()).describe("List of changes in this release"),
});
setOutput("schema", JSON.stringify(z.toJSONSchema(schema)));
'- name:Analyze PRid:analysisuses:pullfrog/pullfrog@v0with:prompt:| Analyze this PR and determine semantic versioning impact.
Return a JSON object matching the provided schema.output_schema:${{ steps.schema.outputs.schema }}env:ANTHROPIC_API_KEY:${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}- name:Process Resultrun:| # Parse the JSON result using fromJSON()
echo "Version: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).version }}"
echo "Breaking: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).isBreaking }}"