David Blass 8c6cd2bda2 cancel + restart workflow run when @pullfrog mention is edited (#612)
* cancel + restart workflow run when @pullfrog mention is edited

- add `WorkflowRun.triggeringCommentId` (BigInt?, indexed) so the webhook
  handler can find the run that was fired by a given comment
- thread `triggeringCommentId` through `reserveRun` / `triggerWorkflow`
- factor `dispatchMentionRun` out of `issue_comment_created` so the same
  shape is reused on edit
- replace the `issue_comment_edited` stub: re-evaluates the trigger gate,
  cancels prior runs (`octokit.rest.actions.cancelWorkflowRun` + DB
  status='cancelled'), then re-dispatches with a `previousRunsNote`
  appended to `eventInstructions` so the agent acknowledges the prior
  run/PR/artifacts in its summary
- if the edit removes `@pullfrog`, cancel only (no restart)

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* thread previousRunsNote via dedicated payload field

user prompt has precedence over eventInstructions, so stuffing the
prior-runs note into eventInstructions made it vanish whenever the
trigger comment contained an @pullfrog mention (which is always for the
edit path). pass it as its own payload field and render it alongside the
user's task so the agent actually sees it.

* delete cancelled run's progress comment on edit-restart

so the issue thread doesn't accumulate "This run was cancelled" stubs
on every edit. only deletes for runs we actively cancel; runs that were
already terminal (e.g. completed before the edit) keep their summary
comment in the thread, and `previousRunsNote` links to it so the new
agent can reference prior work.

post-cleanup is race-safe: the action's `validateStuckProgressComment`
swallows the 404 from the deleted comment and exits cleanly, so the
old run's post step cannot clobber the new run's leaping comment.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* also cancel + delete progress comment when triggering comment is deleted

mirrors the edit-removes-@pullfrog path: when an @pullfrog comment that
fired a run is hard-deleted, look up any prior runs by triggeringCommentId,
GH-cancel running ones, and delete their leaping progress comments.

skips trigger-gate re-eval (we're tearing down a run, not firing one) and
performs no restart. reuses the existing cancelRunsForTriggeringComment
helper; the returned previousRunsNote is discarded since no dispatch
follows.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* fix: move cancellation before trigger gate in issue_comment_edited

cancelRunsForTriggeringComment now runs before the triggerEnabled check,
so edits that remove @pullfrog still cancel in-flight runs even when the
repo mention trigger is currently disabled (e.g. for non-collaborators).

* anneal: scope cancel updates per-row + simplify edit gate

- replace blanket updateMany on (triggeringCommentId, repoId) with per-row, status-guarded updates so a parallel handler's freshly-reserved run cannot be clobbered into cancelled by a racing edit delivery.
- drop wasMention/isMention early-break in issue_comment_edited; always run cancelRunsForTriggeringComment (DB is the canonical "did this comment ever trigger a run" source). closes the missing-changes.body.from edge and lets us tear down a still-running prior run even if the admin disabled the mention trigger mid-flight.
- buildPreviousRunsNote returns undefined (not "") when no link lines materialize.
- doc cleanups + wiki/modes.md addendum noting issue_comment_edited / _deleted now drive cancel + restart.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* address review feedback on cancel/restart semantics

- guard workflow_run.completed update against status='cancelled' so a
  successful-but-uncancellable GH Actions job can't resurrect a cancelled
  row (and re-bill it) via the completed webhook.
- bucket only status='completed' runs into `preserved` in
  cancelRunsForTriggeringComment; cancelled/failed prior runs have stubs
  as their progress comment, not summaries worth referencing.
- emit previousRunsNote for the runId-null cancel case so the restarted
  agent always knows when it's superseding a prior dispatch.
- drop the agent-forbidden `gh pr list` hint and soften 'was cancelled'
  to 'was signalled to cancel' in the note body.
- post a fallback comment when the edit-path dispatch fails (prior run
  already torn down and progress comment already deleted).
- symmetrize the delete-handler's pullfrog guard with the edit handler
  (key off hook.comment.user, not hook.sender).
- trim misleading comments on the per-row DB update guard.

---------

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: pullfrog[bot] <226033991+pullfrog[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Colin McDonnell <colinmcd94@gmail.com>
2026-05-11 23:20:44 +00:00
2026-01-16 08:00:16 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00
2025-08-27 16:53:48 -07:00
2026-01-19 08:41:56 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00

Green Pullfrog logo
Pullfrog

Bring your favorite coding agent into GitHub


🚀 Pullfrog is in beta! We're onboarding users in waves. Get on the waitlist →


What is Pullfrog?

Pullfrog is a GitHub bot that brings the full power of your favorite coding agents into GitHub. It's open source and powered by GitHub Actions.

  • Tag @pullfrog — Tag @pullfrog in a comment anywhere in your repo. It will pull in any relevant context using the action's internal MCP server and perform the appropriate task.
  • Prompt from the web — Trigger arbitrary tasks from the Pullfrog dashboard
  • Automated triggers — Configure Pullfrog to trigger agent runs in response to specific events. Each of these triggers can be associated with custom prompt instructions.
    • issue created
    • issue labeled
    • PR created
    • PR review created
    • PR review requested
    • and more...

Pullfrog is the bridge between your preferred coding agents and GitHub. Use it for:

  • 🤖 Coding tasks — Tell @pullfrog to implement something and it'll spin up a PR. If CI fails, it'll read the logs and attempt a fix automatically. It'll automatically address any PR reviews too.
  • 🔍 PR review — Coding agents are great at reviewing PRs. Using the "PR created" trigger, you can configure Pullfrog to auto-review new PRs.
  • 🤙 Issue management — Via the "issue created" trigger, Pullfrog can automatically respond to common questions, create implementation plans, and link to related issues/PRs. Or (if you're feeling lucky) you can prompt it to immediately attempt a PR addressing new issues.
  • Literally whatever — Want to have the agent automatically add docs to all new PRs? Cut a new release with agent-written notes on every commit to main? Pullfrog lets you do it.

Standalone Usage

You can also use pullfrog/pullfrog as a step in your own workflows. The action exposes a result output that can be consumed by subsequent steps.

Example: Auto-generate release notes on new tags

name: Release
on:
  push:
    tags: ['v*']

permissions:
  contents: write

jobs:
  release:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Generate release notes
        id: notes
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Generate release notes for ${{ github.ref_name }}.
            Compare commits between this tag and the previous tag.
            Format as markdown: summary paragraph, then ### Features, ### Fixes, ### Breaking Changes sections.
            Omit empty sections. Be concise.
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      # write to file to avoid shell escaping issues with special characters
      - name: Create GitHub release
        run: |
          notesfile="$RUNNER_TEMP/release-notes-$GITHUB_RUN_ID.md"
          printf '%s' "$NOTES" > "$notesfile"
          gh release create ${{ github.ref_name }} --title "${{ github.ref_name }}" --notes-file "$notesfile"
        env:
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
          NOTES: ${{ steps.notes.outputs.result }}

Example: Structured Output with Zod Schema

You can force the agent to return structured JSON output by providing a JSON schema. This allows you to reliably parse and use the agent's response in subsequent workflow steps.

You can define your JSON schema directly or uou can use any validation library that converts to JSON Schema. Here's an example using Zod:

name: Release Check
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [closed]

jobs:
  check-release:
    if: github.event.pull_request.merged == true
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: npm install --no-save --no-package-lock zod @actions/core

      - name: Generate Schema
        id: schema
        run: |
          node -e '
            import { z } from "zod";
            import { setOutput } from "@actions/core";
            const schema = z.object({
              version: z.string().describe("Semantic version number (e.g. 1.0.0)"),
              isBreaking: z.boolean().describe("Whether this release contains breaking changes"),
              changelog: z.array(z.string()).describe("List of changes in this release"),
            });
            setOutput("schema", JSON.stringify(z.toJSONSchema(schema)));
          '

      - name: Analyze PR
        id: analysis
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Analyze this PR and determine semantic versioning impact.
            Return a JSON object matching the provided schema.
          output_schema: ${{ steps.schema.outputs.schema }}
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      - name: Process Result
        run: |
          # Parse the JSON result using fromJSON()
          echo "Version: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).version }}"
          echo "Breaking: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).isBreaking }}"
S
Description
Self-hosted Ollama-powered code review bot for Gitea Actions based on pullfrog
Readme MIT 27 MiB
Languages
TypeScript 97.9%
Shell 0.7%
Dockerfile 0.7%
JavaScript 0.7%