Anna Bocharova 9c99bcbbac feat: Improving the plan revisions (#465)
* feat(plans): Suggested plan for plan revisions.

* fix: add planCommentId to reduce GitHub API calls.

* Revert "fix: add planCommentId to reduce GitHub API calls."

This reverts commit ef9c24811fa291b12ac3601cc4cd3edb7c9a0fca.

* Improving plan revision: the implementation draft.

* fix schema composition order.

* fix: reusing existing retry helper (action) for reportPlanCommentToRun.

* mv: updatePlanCommentId.

* fix: higher severity for logging error.

* fix: add error handling when calling findExistingPlanCommentIdForIssue.

* feat: improving the revisit plan request detection by adding PLAN_REVISION_VERBS.

* Updating the plan with alternative non-determenistic solution.

* add more verbs to PLAN_REVISION_VERBS.

* fix: supply the previous plan in the event context as previousPlanBody, updating Plan mode instructions.

* fix: adjusting the way PLAN_REVISION_VERBS are used in sentences.

* fix: using GraphQL approach with NodeId to find commentId in findExistingPlanCommentIdForIssue.

* fix: use double word boundaries (both sides).

* fix condition in findExistingPlanCommentIdForIssue.

* fix: rm unused args from findExistingPlanCommentIdForIssue.

* bump the action version.

* fix(plan): rm everything related to approach A.

* fix(plan): No limit for progress comments.

* feat(plan): the new plan.

* Revert: changed to webhook (no longer involved).

* feat: mv plan comment lookup into a new API endpoint.

* Revert: changes to select_mode tool.

* FEAT: The new implementation.

* fix arktype issues.

* fix plan diagram.

* fix(selectMode): e2e type constraints for fetchExistingPlanComment.

* Revert "fix(selectMode): e2e type constraints for fetchExistingPlanComment."

This reverts commit 53f3b6650a9928e3080700faa9eead0052e94333.

* fix(selectMode): type constraints (copy) for fetchExistingPlanComment.

* feat: improving isHttpError helper and reusing it consistently instead of casting.

* address review: remove unconditional retry, add plan comment warning, dedupe type, remove dead guard, fix GraphQL types

* Fix: tightening the PlanEdit guidance.

* fix(select_mode): Providing the agent with existingPlanCommentId as well.

* fix(instructions): Adjusting the primary guidance to prefer Plan mode for issue-related ambiguous requests.

* fix(wiki): updating the delegation docs according to the current instructions.

* fix(instructions): rm implication to call for issue details.

* fix(select_mode): tweak for PlanEdit.

* fix(select_mode): more tweaks to PlanEdit.

* fix(select_mode): tweaks for the order of instructions and context.

* revert: to the state of 5c400efce1f1fec0a0855eeacad2bc3b721fd1bf.

* fix(select_mode): Correcting the guideline.

* rm the plan from the branch (impletemented).

---------

Co-authored-by: pullfrog[bot] <226033991+pullfrog[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-03-10 20:34:54 +00:00
2026-01-16 08:00:16 +00:00
2025-08-27 16:53:48 -07:00
2026-01-19 08:41:56 +00:00
2026-02-06 07:16:14 +00:00
2026-02-23 23:41:27 +00:00
2026-03-10 20:34:54 +00:00
2026-01-23 06:28:22 +00:00

Green Pullfrog logo
Pullfrog

Bring your favorite coding agent into GitHub


🚀 Pullfrog is in beta! We're onboarding users in waves. Get on the waitlist →


What is Pullfrog?

Pullfrog is a GitHub bot that brings the full power of your favorite coding agents into GitHub. It's open source and powered by GitHub Actions.

  • Tag @pullfrog — Tag @pullfrog in a comment anywhere in your repo. It will pull in any relevant context using the action's internal MCP server and perform the appropriate task.
  • Prompt from the web — Trigger arbitrary tasks from the Pullfrog dashboard
  • Automated triggers — Configure Pullfrog to trigger agent runs in response to specific events. Each of these triggers can be associated with custom prompt instructions.
    • issue created
    • issue labeled
    • PR created
    • PR review created
    • PR review requested
    • and more...

Pullfrog is the bridge between your preferred coding agents and GitHub. Use it for:

  • 🤖 Coding tasks — Tell @pullfrog to implement something and it'll spin up a PR. If CI fails, it'll read the logs and attempt a fix automatically. It'll automatically address any PR reviews too.
  • 🔍 PR review — Coding agents are great at reviewing PRs. Using the "PR created" trigger, you can configure Pullfrog to auto-review new PRs.
  • 🤙 Issue management — Via the "issue created" trigger, Pullfrog can automatically respond to common questions, create implementation plans, and link to related issues/PRs. Or (if you're feeling lucky) you can prompt it to immediately attempt a PR addressing new issues.
  • Literally whatever — Want to have the agent automatically add docs to all new PRs? Cut a new release with agent-written notes on every commit to main? Pullfrog lets you do it.

Standalone Usage

You can also use pullfrog/pullfrog as a step in your own workflows. The action exposes a result output that can be consumed by subsequent steps.

Example: Auto-generate release notes on new tags

name: Release
on:
  push:
    tags: ['v*']

permissions:
  contents: write

jobs:
  release:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Generate release notes
        id: notes
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Generate release notes for ${{ github.ref_name }}.
            Compare commits between this tag and the previous tag.
            Format as markdown: summary paragraph, then ### Features, ### Fixes, ### Breaking Changes sections.
            Omit empty sections. Be concise.
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      # write to file to avoid shell escaping issues with special characters
      - name: Create GitHub release
        run: |
          notesfile="$RUNNER_TEMP/release-notes-$GITHUB_RUN_ID.md"
          printf '%s' "$NOTES" > "$notesfile"
          gh release create ${{ github.ref_name }} --title "${{ github.ref_name }}" --notes-file "$notesfile"
        env:
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
          NOTES: ${{ steps.notes.outputs.result }}

Example: Structured Output with Zod Schema

You can force the agent to return structured JSON output by providing a JSON schema. This allows you to reliably parse and use the agent's response in subsequent workflow steps.

You can define your JSON schema directly or uou can use any validation library that converts to JSON Schema. Here's an example using Zod:

name: Release Check
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [closed]

jobs:
  check-release:
    if: github.event.pull_request.merged == true
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: npm install --no-save --no-package-lock zod @actions/core

      - name: Generate Schema
        id: schema
        run: |
          node -e '
            import { z } from "zod";
            import { setOutput } from "@actions/core";
            const schema = z.object({
              version: z.string().describe("Semantic version number (e.g. 1.0.0)"),
              isBreaking: z.boolean().describe("Whether this release contains breaking changes"),
              changelog: z.array(z.string()).describe("List of changes in this release"),
            });
            setOutput("schema", JSON.stringify(z.toJSONSchema(schema)));
          '

      - name: Analyze PR
        id: analysis
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Analyze this PR and determine semantic versioning impact.
            Return a JSON object matching the provided schema.
          output_schema: ${{ steps.schema.outputs.schema }}
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      - name: Process Result
        run: |
          # Parse the JSON result using fromJSON()
          echo "Version: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).version }}"
          echo "Breaking: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).isBreaking }}"
S
Description
Self-hosted Ollama-powered code review bot for Gitea Actions based on pullfrog
Readme MIT 27 MiB
Languages
TypeScript 97.9%
Shell 0.7%
Dockerfile 0.7%
JavaScript 0.7%