Colin McDonnell ec43c0e0d1 router: fix bugs from PR #616 review (#625)
Three real defects flagged in the post-merge review of #616, plus one cheap
hardening:

1. OpenCode `limit.output` override was a silent no-op on opencode-ai@1.1.56.
   Top-level `limit.output` has no read site in OpenCode (verified against
   the v1.1.56 source: `OUTPUT_TOKEN_MAX = Flag.OPENCODE_EXPERIMENTAL_OUTPUT_TOKEN_MAX
   || 32_000` in session/llm.ts; per-model `model.limit.output` has its own
   scope). Plumbed via `OPENCODE_EXPERIMENTAL_OUTPUT_TOKEN_MAX=5000` env var
   on the OpenCode spawn instead. Drops dead `OpenCodeConfig.limit?` type
   field and the corresponding config write in `buildSecurityConfig`. This
   was the headline mechanism of #616 — without the env var, the upfront
   `max_tokens` reservation stayed at 32_000 and low-wallet runs continued
   failing the way #616 was supposed to prevent.

2. Phantom auto-reload buffer for detached-card accounts. DELETE
   /payment-method clears `stripeCustomerId` but leaves `autoReloadEnabled`
   intact, so an account with welcome-credit residue and a detached card
   could mint a key with `keyLimitCents = balance + autoReloadAmountCents`
   ($50 default, schema-cap $100K) of free spend headroom we have no way
   to bill. Conjunctive `account.autoReloadEnabled && hasCard` in the
   buffer selection closes this. Defense-in-depth follow-up worth doing:
   clear `autoReloadEnabled` in the card-detach handler.

3. The autoReloadEnabled 402 branch fired for phase-1 noop paths
   (`!stripeCustomerId`, `reloadAmountCents < 50`, `balance >= threshold`)
   where `result.failure == null`, returning `"insufficient balance"` with
   no actionable code. Gated on `result.status === "failed"` so non-charge
   paths fall through to the `hasCard` / no-card branches and emit
   `router_balance_exhausted` / `router_requires_card` instead.

4. (cheap) `ROUTER_KEYLIMIT_EXHAUSTED_PATTERN` now uses `/is` instead of
   `/i` so `.*?` crosses newlines. Defends the BillingError reclassification
   against any upstream layer that wraps the OpenRouter error onto multiple
   lines. Trivial.

Test plan: 488/488 unit tests pass (1 new test for newline regex behavior).
2026-05-08 21:02:38 +00:00
2026-01-16 08:00:16 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00
2025-08-27 16:53:48 -07:00
2026-01-19 08:41:56 +00:00
2026-03-12 05:22:51 +00:00

Green Pullfrog logo
Pullfrog

Bring your favorite coding agent into GitHub


🚀 Pullfrog is in beta! We're onboarding users in waves. Get on the waitlist →


What is Pullfrog?

Pullfrog is a GitHub bot that brings the full power of your favorite coding agents into GitHub. It's open source and powered by GitHub Actions.

  • Tag @pullfrog — Tag @pullfrog in a comment anywhere in your repo. It will pull in any relevant context using the action's internal MCP server and perform the appropriate task.
  • Prompt from the web — Trigger arbitrary tasks from the Pullfrog dashboard
  • Automated triggers — Configure Pullfrog to trigger agent runs in response to specific events. Each of these triggers can be associated with custom prompt instructions.
    • issue created
    • issue labeled
    • PR created
    • PR review created
    • PR review requested
    • and more...

Pullfrog is the bridge between your preferred coding agents and GitHub. Use it for:

  • 🤖 Coding tasks — Tell @pullfrog to implement something and it'll spin up a PR. If CI fails, it'll read the logs and attempt a fix automatically. It'll automatically address any PR reviews too.
  • 🔍 PR review — Coding agents are great at reviewing PRs. Using the "PR created" trigger, you can configure Pullfrog to auto-review new PRs.
  • 🤙 Issue management — Via the "issue created" trigger, Pullfrog can automatically respond to common questions, create implementation plans, and link to related issues/PRs. Or (if you're feeling lucky) you can prompt it to immediately attempt a PR addressing new issues.
  • Literally whatever — Want to have the agent automatically add docs to all new PRs? Cut a new release with agent-written notes on every commit to main? Pullfrog lets you do it.

Standalone Usage

You can also use pullfrog/pullfrog as a step in your own workflows. The action exposes a result output that can be consumed by subsequent steps.

Example: Auto-generate release notes on new tags

name: Release
on:
  push:
    tags: ['v*']

permissions:
  contents: write

jobs:
  release:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Generate release notes
        id: notes
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Generate release notes for ${{ github.ref_name }}.
            Compare commits between this tag and the previous tag.
            Format as markdown: summary paragraph, then ### Features, ### Fixes, ### Breaking Changes sections.
            Omit empty sections. Be concise.
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      # write to file to avoid shell escaping issues with special characters
      - name: Create GitHub release
        run: |
          notesfile="$RUNNER_TEMP/release-notes-$GITHUB_RUN_ID.md"
          printf '%s' "$NOTES" > "$notesfile"
          gh release create ${{ github.ref_name }} --title "${{ github.ref_name }}" --notes-file "$notesfile"
        env:
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
          NOTES: ${{ steps.notes.outputs.result }}

Example: Structured Output with Zod Schema

You can force the agent to return structured JSON output by providing a JSON schema. This allows you to reliably parse and use the agent's response in subsequent workflow steps.

You can define your JSON schema directly or uou can use any validation library that converts to JSON Schema. Here's an example using Zod:

name: Release Check
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [closed]

jobs:
  check-release:
    if: github.event.pull_request.merged == true
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: npm install --no-save --no-package-lock zod @actions/core

      - name: Generate Schema
        id: schema
        run: |
          node -e '
            import { z } from "zod";
            import { setOutput } from "@actions/core";
            const schema = z.object({
              version: z.string().describe("Semantic version number (e.g. 1.0.0)"),
              isBreaking: z.boolean().describe("Whether this release contains breaking changes"),
              changelog: z.array(z.string()).describe("List of changes in this release"),
            });
            setOutput("schema", JSON.stringify(z.toJSONSchema(schema)));
          '

      - name: Analyze PR
        id: analysis
        uses: pullfrog/pullfrog@v0
        with:
          prompt: |
            Analyze this PR and determine semantic versioning impact.
            Return a JSON object matching the provided schema.
          output_schema: ${{ steps.schema.outputs.schema }}
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

      - name: Process Result
        run: |
          # Parse the JSON result using fromJSON()
          echo "Version: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).version }}"
          echo "Breaking: ${{ fromJSON(steps.analysis.outputs.result).isBreaking }}"
S
Description
Self-hosted Ollama-powered code review bot for Gitea Actions based on pullfrog
Readme MIT 27 MiB
Languages
TypeScript 97.9%
Shell 0.7%
Dockerfile 0.7%
JavaScript 0.7%