Compare commits
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a90743e9fe | |||
| 3d0c12976e | |||
| 823fa3a39b |
@@ -144427,7 +144427,7 @@ function computeModes() {
|
||||
- **Check PR consistency**: Does the PR title/description match the actual code changes? Flag significant discrepancies.
|
||||
- Do NOT stop at "this looks reasonable." Dig until you either find a problem or have concrete evidence there isn't one.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **DRAFT LINE-BY-LINE COMMENTS** - Every comment must be actionable: the author should need to change something in response. 2-3 sentences max. Use the NEW line number from the diff (second column: \`| OLD | NEW | TYPE | CODE\`). If no issues found, skip to step 5. Non-actionable comments (praise, style preferences, minor optimizations, documentation nits) must not be drafted. If no comments survive and you have no significant concerns, **do not submit a review**. Use \`${ghPullfrogMcpName}/report_progress\` to note the PR was reviewed and no issues were found.
|
||||
4. **DRAFT LINE-BY-LINE COMMENTS** - Every comment must be actionable: the author should need to change something in response. 2-3 sentences max. Use the NEW line number from the diff (second column: \`| OLD | NEW | TYPE | CODE\`). If no issues found, skip to step 5. NO COMPLIMENTS. NO NITPICKING ABOUT CHANGES UNRELATED TO THE MAIN CHANGE. Non-actionable comments (praise, style preferences, minor optimizations, documentation nits) must not be drafted. If no comments survive and you have no significant concerns, **do not submit a review**. Use \`${ghPullfrogMcpName}/report_progress\` to note the PR was reviewed and no issues were found.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **WRITE SUMMARY** - Draft a 1-3 sentence summary for the review body. Include urgency level and any concerns about code outside the diff.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -144554,7 +144554,7 @@ import { join as join9 } from "node:path";
|
||||
// package.json
|
||||
var package_default = {
|
||||
name: "@pullfrog/pullfrog",
|
||||
version: "0.0.165",
|
||||
version: "0.0.167",
|
||||
type: "module",
|
||||
files: [
|
||||
"index.js",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ export function computeModes(): Mode[] {
|
||||
- **Check PR consistency**: Does the PR title/description match the actual code changes? Flag significant discrepancies.
|
||||
- Do NOT stop at "this looks reasonable." Dig until you either find a problem or have concrete evidence there isn't one.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **DRAFT LINE-BY-LINE COMMENTS** - Every comment must be actionable: the author should need to change something in response. 2-3 sentences max. Use the NEW line number from the diff (second column: \`| OLD | NEW | TYPE | CODE\`). If no issues found, skip to step 5. Non-actionable comments (praise, style preferences, minor optimizations, documentation nits) must not be drafted. If no comments survive and you have no significant concerns, **do not submit a review**. Use \`${ghPullfrogMcpName}/report_progress\` to note the PR was reviewed and no issues were found.
|
||||
4. **DRAFT LINE-BY-LINE COMMENTS** - Every comment must be actionable: the author should need to change something in response. 2-3 sentences max. Use the NEW line number from the diff (second column: \`| OLD | NEW | TYPE | CODE\`). If no issues found, skip to step 5. NO COMPLIMENTS. NO NITPICKING ABOUT CHANGES UNRELATED TO THE MAIN CHANGE. Non-actionable comments (praise, style preferences, minor optimizations, documentation nits) must not be drafted. If no comments survive and you have no significant concerns, **do not submit a review**. Use \`${ghPullfrogMcpName}/report_progress\` to note the PR was reviewed and no issues were found.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **WRITE SUMMARY** - Draft a 1-3 sentence summary for the review body. Include urgency level and any concerns about code outside the diff.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "@pullfrog/pullfrog",
|
||||
"version": "0.0.165",
|
||||
"version": "0.0.167",
|
||||
"type": "module",
|
||||
"files": [
|
||||
"index.js",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user